Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 5, 2025

Development and Implementation of a Multi-Disciplinary Technology Enhanced Care Pathway for Youth and Adults with Concussion
Published on: January 20, 2019
Ask About What Matters: An Intervention to Improve Accessible Advance Care Planning Documentation
Molly A Kantor1, Brandon S Scott2, Yumiko Abe-Jones1
1Division of Hospital Medicine (M.A.K., B.S.S., Y.A.-J., K.E.R., R.T., M.M.), University of California, San Francisco, California, USA; Department of Medicine (M.A.K., B.S.S., Y.A.-J., K.E.R., R.T., M.M.), University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Context:
Advance care planning (ACP) informs future medical decision-making, especially for patients with advanced age or serious illness. For clinicians to act on these preferences, or continue the ACP conversation as illness progresses, documentation of ACP discussions must be readily accessible within the electronic health record (EHR).
Objectives:
Develop an intervention to improve accessible ACP documentation for hospitalized patients and assess its impact on viewing and documentation of ACP conversations within a specific EHR location.
Methods:
Adult patients age 75 or older or with serious illness discharged during a two-year period were included. The EHR's ACP Navigator was targeted as the intended location for documenting ACP-related activities. We implemented a hospital-wide, multipronged intervention that included increased ACP Navigator visibility and a process for workflow-congruent ACP documentation. Accessible ACP documentation was measured by documentation within the ACP Navigator and was analyzed by interrupted time-series analysis. ACP Navigator access was measured by user audit logs.
Results:
After the intervention, 6703 of 16,117 (41.6%) patient encounters had accessible ACP documentation, compared to 3689 of 13,143 (28.1%) preintervention (P < .001). In the intervention's first month, accessible ACP documentation increased 5.3% (P < .001, CI 2.9%-7.6%), followed by a 1.3% monthly increase relative to the preintervention period (P < .001, CI 1.0%-1.6%). ACP Navigator access for patients with ACP documentation increased in the intervention period (52.2% vs. 39.8%, P < .001).
Conclusion:
An institution-wide intervention significantly increased accessible ACP documentation within a centralized location of the EHR. EHR usability changes improved rates of accessible ACP documentation and subsequent views of this documentation.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities
Methods of Documentation IV: Focus Charting
It typically involves three columns for recording information:
Standards of Care II
Legal Guidelines for Documentation
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Methods of Documentation III: PIE

