Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 5, 2025

Lung Rapid Recovery Procurement Combined with Abdominal Normothermic Regional Perfusion in Controlled Donation after Circulatory Death
Published on: August 15, 2022
Donation after circulatory death and liver transplantation: a cohort study
Serena Maria Passamonti1, Antonino Cannavò1, Mauro Panigada2
1UOC Coordinamento Trapianti, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda-Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Insights
Type III donation after circulatory death (DCD) livers showed higher transplant success rates compared to type II. Prolonged warm ischemia time may contribute to this difference in liver donation outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Transplantation immunology
- Organ donation research
- Surgical outcomes
Background:
- Donations after circulatory death (DCD) present challenges in Italy, including extended warm ischemia time (tWIT) due to legal and logistical factors.
- Understanding the impact of different DCD types on transplantation success is crucial for optimizing organ utilization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the association between successful liver transplantation and DCD types within the North Italy Transplant program.
- To compare the outcomes of type III versus type II DCD liver donations.
Main Methods:
- A cohort study included consecutive DCD cases from 2008 to 2020.
- Poisson regression with robust error variance was used to estimate adjusted risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
- Analysis focused on liver eligibility, recovery, and transplantation rates, controlling for warm ischemia time (tWIT).
Main Results:
- Type III DCD livers had a higher likelihood of being transplanted (RR: 1.49; 95% CI: 1.01-2.19) compared to type II.
- Livers from type III DCD were recovered more frequently (75%) than from type II (64%).
- The difference in transplant rates diminished after controlling for tWIT, suggesting its significant role.
Conclusions:
- Type III DCD livers demonstrate a greater probability of successful transplantation than type II.
- Warm ischemia time is a critical factor influencing the disparity in transplantation outcomes between DCD types.
- Optimizing strategies to minimize tWIT is essential for improving DCD liver transplantation in Italy.
Abstract:
Donations after circulatory death (DCD) are still challenging in Italy because of prolonged ischemia time (tWIT) due to the law and logistical issues. This cohort study was primarily aimed at assessing the association between successful transplantation and DCD types in the North Italy Transplant program. Adjusted risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for type III versus type II DCD were estimated using a Poisson regression model with a robust error variance. All consecutive DCD between 2008 and 2020 were included. Among 142 DCD, 102 were eligible for liver donation, and 96 were proposed: 68/69 (99%) and 28/33 (85%) type III and II DCD, respectively. Sixty-nine livers were recovered, 51/68 (75%) from type III and 18/28 (64%) from type II DCD, respectively (RR: 1.18; 95% CI: 0.87-1.60). After ex-vivo perfusion, 50/68 (74%) and 14/28 (50%) livers from type III and type II DCD were transplanted (RR: 1.49; 95% CI: 1.01-2.19). The estimate decreased after further controlling for tWIT (RR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.55-2.24). Five patients (7.8%) experienced a PNF, 3/50 and 2/14 from type III and type II DCD, respectively. Type III DCD livers were more likely to be transplanted than type II. Warm ischemia time might explain this difference.

