Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 5, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training
Published on: August 9, 2024
Evaluation of the 2020 Pediatric Emergency Physician Workforce in the US
Christopher L Bennett1, Janice A Espinola2, Ashley F Sullivan2
1Department of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Insights
The majority of pediatric emergency physicians (EPs) work in urban areas, leaving rural communities with limited access to specialized pediatric emergency care. This geographic disparity impacts emergency care availability for children nationwide.
Area of Science:
- Emergency Medicine
- Pediatric Healthcare
- Public Health Workforce Analysis
Background:
- Significant mortality disparities exist for children in rural versus urban settings.
- Pediatric patients have unique healthcare needs requiring specialized emergency care.
- Understanding the pediatric emergency physician (EP) workforce is crucial due to high emergency department volumes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To characterize the demographic profile, training, board certification, and geographic distribution of the 2020 US pediatric EP workforce.
- To identify the availability and distribution patterns of pediatric emergency medicine specialists.
Main Methods:
- A national cross-sectional study utilizing the 2020 American Medical Association Physician Masterfile.
- Linked data with American Board of Medical Specialties certification and self-reported training information.
- Analyzed physician location using Urban Influence Codes to determine urban vs. rural distribution.
Main Results:
- 2403 clinically active pediatric EPs were identified in 2020, with 56% being women.
- Nearly all pediatric EPs (99%) practiced in urban areas, with significant underrepresentation in rural regions.
- Three states had no pediatric EPs, and several had EPs in only one county, indicating severe geographic maldistribution.
Conclusions:
- The study highlights a critical shortage of pediatric emergency physicians in rural America.
- This maldistribution poses significant challenges for providing timely and adequate emergency care to children in underserved areas.
- Findings underscore the need for strategies to improve pediatric emergency care access in rural populations.
Importance:
Given the mortality disparities among children and adolescents in rural vs urban areas, the unique health care needs of pediatric patients, and the annual emergency department volume for this patient population, understanding the availability of pediatric emergency physicians (EPs) is important. Information regarding the available pediatric EP workforce is limited, however.
Objective:
To describe the demographic characteristics, training, board certification, and geographic distribution of the 2020 clinically active pediatric EP workforce in the US.
Design, Setting, And Participants:
This national cross-sectional study of the 2020 pediatric EP workforce used the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile database, which was linked to American Board of Medical Specialties board certification information. Self-reported training data in the database were analyzed to identify clinically active physicians who self-reported pediatric emergency medicine (EM) as their primary or secondary specialty. The Physician Masterfile data were obtained on March 11, 2020.
Main Outcomes And Measures:
The Physician Masterfile was used to identify all clinically active pediatric EPs in the US. The definition of EM training was completion of an EM program (inclusive of both an EM residency and/or a pediatric EM fellowship) or a combined EM program (internal medicine and EM, family medicine and EM, or pediatrics and EM). Physician location was linked and classified by county-level Urban Influence Codes. Pediatric EP density was calculated and mapped using US Census Bureau population estimates.
Results:
A total of 2403 clinically active pediatric EPs were working in 2020 (5% of all clinically active emergency physicians), of whom 1357 were women (56%) and the median (interquartile range) age was 46 (40-55) years. The overall pediatric EP population included 1718 physicians (71%) with EM training and 641 (27%) with pediatric training. Overall, 1639 (68%) were board certified in pediatric EM, of whom 1219 (74%) reported EM training and 400 (24%) reported pediatrics training. Nearly all pediatric EPs worked in urban areas (2369 of 2402 [99%]), and pediatric EPs in urban compared with rural areas were younger (median [interquartile range] age, 46 [40-55] years vs 59 [48-65] years). Pediatric EPs who completed their training 20 years ago or more compared with those who completed training more recently were less likely to work in urban settings (633 [97%] vs 0-4 years: 440 [99%], 5-9 years: 547 [99%], or 10-19 years: 723 [99%]; P = .006). Three states had 0 pediatric EPs (Montana, South Dakota, and Wyoming), and 3 states had pediatric EPs in only 1 county (Alaska, New Mexico, and North Dakota). Less than 1% of counties had 4 or more pediatric EPs per 100 000 population.
Conclusions And Relevance:
This study found that almost all pediatric EPs worked in urban areas, leaving rural areas of the US with limited availability of pediatric emergency care. This finding may have profound implications for children and adolescents needing emergency care.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism
Methods of Documentation VII: EMR

