Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 5, 2025
Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
Published on: February 6, 2019
External Beam Radiation Therapy in pT4 Well-Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: A Population-Based Study of 405 Patients
Daegan Sit1, Wan Xian Koh2, Aria Shokoohi3
1Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Purpose:
The benefit of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in locally advanced, well- differentiated thyroid cancer (WDTC) is uncertain. The purpose of this study is to evaluate locoregional recurrence (LRR), progression-free survival, and cause-specific survival (CSS) of patients with pT4 well-differentiated thyroid carcinoma.
Methods And Materials:
A population-based retrospective review was conducted of consecutive patients with pT4 WDTC (per the American Joint Committee on Cancer, 8th edition, criteria) treated provincially between 1985 and 2013. The primary endpoints were cumulative incidence of LRR and CSS. To account for the competing risks of death from other causes, a Fine-Gray's test was used. A Cox-proportional hazards model was used to analyze overall survival (OS). Multivariate models and propensity matching were used to account for the effects of covariates.
Results:
A total of 405 patients were identified with a median follow-up time of 14.3 years for a total of 4209 person-years of follow up. The median age at the time of diagnosis was 53 years (range, 20-87). There were 211 patients (52%) who received EBRT. EBRT was associated with age ≥55 years (56% vs 35%; P < .001), airway involvement (42% vs 8%; P < .001), and R1/2 resection (81% vs 51%; P < .001). The 10-year outcomes for the non-EBRT and EBRT groups were 21.6% versus 11.4%, respectively, for LRR, 84.1% versus 93.1%, respectively, for CSS, and 85.7% versus 67.5%, respectively, for OS. On multivariate analysis, EBRT was associated with a lower rate of LRR (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.334; P < .001), but not associated with CSS (HR: 1.56; P = .142) nor OS (HR: 1.216; P = .335). After propensity score matching, the EBRT cohort had lower rates of LRR relative to the non-EBRT cohort (HR: 0.261; P = .0003), but there were no differences in CSS or OS.
Conclusions:
In this large, population-based analysis of patients with pT4 WDTC, EBRT was associated with lower rates of LRR, but no difference in CSS or OS.
