Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 5, 2025

09:39
Preparation of Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Electrodes for Chronic Implantation in Rats
Published on: July 14, 2020
8.2K
Is a 50% improvement threshold adequate to justify progression from sacral neuromodulation testing to implant?
David K Charles1, Ross G Everett1, Zachary J Prebay1
1Department of Urologic Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Neurourology and Urodynamics
|May 18, 2021
Summary
Patients with over 75% symptom improvement during sacral neuromodulation testing (SNM-I) are more likely to have long-term success with sacral neuromodulation implantation (SNM-II). A higher initial improvement threshold may predict sustained efficacy.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Neurology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is a treatment for overactive bladder.
- Current criteria for SNM implantation (SNM-II) involve a ≥50% improvement during SNM testing (SNM-I).
- Long-term efficacy of SNM can decrease over time, but the relationship with initial symptom reduction is unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if the degree of symptom improvement after SNM-I predicts long-term success of SNM-II.
- To investigate if a higher improvement threshold during SNM-I could be a better indicator for sustained efficacy.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of patients undergoing SNM for overactive bladder.
- Patients were categorized into two groups based on SNM-I improvement: 50%-75% (Group 1) and >75% (Group 2).
- Clinical variables and long-term device efficacy (mean follow-up 46 months) were compared.
Main Results:
- Of 137 patients implanted, 55% reported 50%-75% improvement (Group 1) and 45% reported >75% improvement (Group 2).
- Long-term device efficacy was significantly higher in Group 2 (68%) compared to Group 1 (44%) (p=0.007).
- Baseline stress urinary incontinence and >75% SNM-I improvement predicted long-term success.
Conclusions:
- A greater than 75% symptom reduction during SNM-I is associated with a higher likelihood of maintaining device efficacy long-term.
- The current 50% improvement threshold for SNM-II may need re-evaluation.
- Further research is needed to confirm if increasing the SNM-I threshold improves patient outcomes.

