Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 5, 2025

Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories
Published on: November 14, 2018
A cross-sectional study of neuromyths among teachers in a Caribbean nation
Satyavi Bissessar1, Farid F Youssef1
1Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago, West Indies.
Background:
The current COVID-19 pandemic and proliferation of misinformation regarding science highlights the importance of improving general science literacy. The continued preponderance of neuromyths among educators is of concern, especially in lower- and middle-income countries.
Method:
Using an adapted questionnaire, a cross-sectional survey was conducted among teachers in a small island developing state in the Caribbean.
Results:
Two-thirds of the sample were unable to recognise at least 50% of the myths. Regression analysis demonstrated that higher scores in brain knowledge and exposure to prior teacher-training increased belief in neuromyths. On the other hand, specific in-service training pertaining to educational neuroscience improved scores.
Conclusion:
Neuromyths are prevalent among teachers and appear to inform their teaching practice. Further research needs to be conducted to explore not just the prevalence of these myths but in what ways they may be impacting teaching and learning outcomes in the classroom.
Related Concept Videos
Cross-Sectional Research
Surveys
Case Studies
Group Design
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Bias in Epidemiological Studies

