Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

How the Science of Reading Informs 21st-Century Education.

Yaacov Petscher1, Sonia Q Cabell1, Hugh W Catts1

  • 1Florida Center for Reading Research, Florida State University.

Reading Research Quarterly
|May 19, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The association between reading anxiety and reading achievement: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Psychological bulletin·2026
Same author

Correction: Defining dyslexia: 2025 revision.

Annals of dyslexia·2026
Same author

Psychometric Evaluation of the Spanish Translation of the Disruptive-Behavior Disorder Rating Scale.

Journal of attention disorders·2026
Same author

Defining dyslexia: 2025 revision.

Annals of dyslexia·2026
Same author

Investigating individual differences in adult bilinguals' spelling of cognates: An analysis of cross-linguistic effects.

Bilingualism (Cambridge, England)·2026
Same author

Establishing the measurement invariance of the Eating Disorder Inventory across Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Asian, non-Hispanic Black or African American, and non-Hispanic White adults.

Psychological assessment·2026
Same journal

Improving the Measures of Phonological Ability in the Russian Language: IRT and CART Modeling Application.

Reading research quarterly·2025
Same journal

The Role of Neural and Genetic Processes in Learning to Read and Specific Reading Disabilities: Implications for Instruction.

Reading research quarterly·2023
Same journal

Early Identification of Children with Dyslexia: Variables Differentially Predict Poor Reading Versus Unexpected Poor Reading.

Reading research quarterly·2023
Same journal

What We Know and Need to Know about Literacy Interventions for Elementary Students with Reading Difficulties and Disabilities, including Dyslexia.

Reading research quarterly·2023
Same journal

Set for Variability as a Critical Predictor of Word Reading: Potential Implications for Early Identification and Treatment of Dyslexia.

Reading research quarterly·2023
Same journal

When Treatment Adherence Matters: Interactions Among Treatment Adherence, Instructional Quality, and Student Characteristics on Reading Outcomes.

Reading research quarterly·2022
See all related articles

The science of reading relies on scientific evidence for effective instruction and early identification of reading difficulties. This paper clarifies what constitutes evidence in the science of reading.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive science
  • Educational psychology
  • Literacy research

Background:

  • The science of reading is supported by decades of research, including randomized controlled trials.
  • Misinformation regarding the science of reading is prevalent, creating confusion among stakeholders.
  • An epistemological lens is needed to clarify evidence standards in reading science.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To revisit the science of reading through an epistemological framework.
  • To critically evaluate the existing evidence base in reading science.
  • To identify areas for advancing the science of reading for all children.

Main Methods:

  • Review and synthesis of existing scientific literature on reading.
  • Epistemological analysis of evidence standards in reading research.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Categorization of evidence as compelling, promising, or lacking.

    • Main Results:

    • A substantial evidence base exists for reading instruction, intervention, and early identification.
    • Certain aspects of reading science lack compelling empirical support.
    • Clarification of evidence is crucial to combat misinformation.

    Conclusions:

    • The science of reading must be grounded in rigorous scientific methodology.
    • Continued research and critical evaluation are necessary to advance reading science.
    • Addressing the needs of all children requires a robust, evidence-based approach to reading instruction.