Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ranks01:02

Ranks

322
Unlike parametric methods, nonparametric statistics are ideal for nominal and ordinal data, requiring fewer assumptions about the population's nature or distribution. This makes nonparametric methods easier to apply and interpret, as they do not depend on parameters like mean or standard deviation. One common approach in nonparametric analysis is to sort data according to a specific criterion. For instance, we might arrange weather data from hottest to coldest days in a month or rank cities...
322
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

351
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
351
Relative Frequency Distribution00:55

Relative Frequency Distribution

12.4K
A relative frequency distribution is the proportion or fraction of times a value occurs in a data set. To find the relative frequencies, one can divide each frequency by the total number of data points in the sample. It is very similar to a regular frequency distribution, except that instead of reporting how many data values fall in a class, a relative frequency distribution reports the fraction of data values that fall in a class. These fractions or proportions are called relative frequencies...
12.4K
Relative Frequency Histogram01:14

Relative Frequency Histogram

6.0K
The relative frequency depicts the proportion of data points that have each value. The frequency tells the number of data points that have each value. Like the histogram, a relative frequency histogram also has the same shape with a horizontal scale (the x-axis), but the vertical scale (the y-axis) is marked with relative frequencies (percentages of the whole) instead of actual frequencies. A relative frequency histogram is a graphical representation of a frequency distribution where the...
6.0K
Graphical Representation of Inequalities01:28

Graphical Representation of Inequalities

41
The graph of the equation where y equals x squared forms a curve known as a parabola. This curve acts as a boundary in the coordinate plane, dividing it into distinct regions based on the relative position of points.When the equality sign in the equation is replaced with an inequality—such as greater than, less than, greater than or equal to, or less than or equal to—the graphical representation changes from a single curve into a broader shaded area that signifies the set of all...
41
Ordinal Level of Measurement00:55

Ordinal Level of Measurement

28.5K
The way a set of data is measured is called its level of measurement. Correct statistical procedures depend on a researcher being familiar with levels of measurement. For analysis, data are classified into four levels of measurement—nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio.
Data measured using an ordinal scale are similar to nominal scale data, but there is one major difference. The ordinal scale data can be ordered. An example of ordinal scale data is a list of the top five national parks...
28.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Modulation of miRNA Signature in Human Adipose Tissue After 3 Months of ω-3PUFA Supplementation.

Cells·2026
Same author

Transmission Electron Microscopy Corneal Ultrastructure Study in Hematocornea of Corneal Transplant Graft.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Tibial Artery Hemodynamics Predict Foveal Avascular Zone Enlargement in Type 2 Diabetes.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Three Unrelated Children With Childhood Apraxia of Speech: Exome Sequencing and Functional Gene Analysis Imply a Role of Laminin-511 in Early Neurodevelopment.

Case reports in genetics·2026
Same author

Risk Factors Associated with Corneal Nerve Fiber Length Reduction in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.

Journal of clinical medicine·2025
Same author

Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss Following Cataract Surgery in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Comprehensive Review.

Biomedicines·2025
Same journal

Cross-Domain Transfer Learning from Peptides to Metabolites Using a Multi-Property Fine-Tuned LLM.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Biomedical Concept Recognition with Error-aware Negative-enhanced Ranking Framework.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

TEDLH: Domain HMMs for sensitive detection of remote homologues.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

PLNFGL: Joint Estimation of Multi-Condition Gene Networks from Single-cell RNA-seq Data.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

MCFST: Spatial domain identification method based on multi-view graph convolutional network and graph fusion network.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

SpaBiT: Enhancing Spatial Transcriptomics Resolution via Bidirectional Attention Transformers.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 5, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.8K

Family Rank: a graphical domain knowledge informed feature ranking algorithm.

Michelle Saul1,2, Valentin Dinu1

  • 1College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-9020, USA.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)
|May 19, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Feature selection for prediction models can overfit small datasets. Family Rank, a new algorithm, uses domain knowledge to improve feature ranking, reducing the data needed to find true predictors.

More Related Videos

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation
07:15

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation

Published on: January 16, 2019

11.2K
Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework
06:19

Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework

Published on: July 22, 2025

1.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 5, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.8K
Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation
07:15

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation

Published on: January 16, 2019

11.2K
Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework
06:19

Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework

Published on: July 22, 2025

1.4K

Area of Science:

  • Computational Biology
  • Bioinformatics
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Feature selection methods can overfit training data in prediction models with many features and small sample sizes, leading to the selection of irrelevant features.
  • Incorporating domain knowledge into feature selection is a potential strategy to mitigate overfitting.
  • The Family Rank algorithm is introduced, which ranks features using both graphical domain knowledge and empirical data scores.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and evaluate the Family Rank algorithm for feature selection.
  • To demonstrate the algorithm's ability to mitigate overfitting in prediction models.
  • To assess the performance of Family Rank compared to existing graph-based ranking algorithms.

Main Methods:

  • The Family Rank algorithm combines graphical domain knowledge with feature scores derived from empirical data.
  • A simulated dataset was used to compare Family Rank against state-of-the-art graph-based ranking algorithms.
  • A real-world application in oncology was explored to demonstrate practical utility.

Main Results:

  • Family Rank outperformed other graph-based ranking algorithms on a simulated dataset.
  • The algorithm reduced the required sample size for detecting true predictors by 2- to 3-fold.
  • The study explored a real-world application of Family Rank in oncology.

Conclusions:

  • Family Rank offers an effective approach to feature selection by integrating domain knowledge, potentially improving prediction model performance.
  • The algorithm demonstrates superior performance in scenarios with limited sample sizes.
  • Family Rank provides a valuable tool for researchers, with an implementation available for use.