Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 5, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Validation of Hypertensive Disorders During Pregnancy: ICD-10 Codes in a High-burden Southeastern United States
Katie Labgold1, Kaitlyn K Stanhope2, Naima T Joseph2
1From the Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Insights
International Classification of Diseases v. 10 (ICD-10) codes generally identify hypertensive disorders in pregnancy well, but have low sensitivity for preeclampsia without severe features. These findings offer bias parameters for future research in high-burden populations.
Area of Science:
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Public Health
- Health Informatics
Background:
- Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy research often relies on International Classification of Diseases v. 10 (ICD-10) codes.
- Billing-focused ICD-10 codes may introduce misclassification errors compared to medical records.
- This study evaluates ICD-10 code validity for hypertensive disorders in pregnancy within a high-burden hospital setting.
Purpose of the Study:
- To estimate the validity of ICD-10 codes for identifying hypertensive disorders during pregnancy.
- To compare ICD-10 code accuracy against medical record diagnoses (gold standard).
- To assess validity across various hypertensive subdiagnoses.
Main Methods:
- Linked medical record and hospital discharge data for deliveries (July 2016-June 2018) at a public hospital in Atlanta, Georgia.
- Calculated positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity, and specificity for ICD-10 codes versus medical records.
- Evaluated overall hypertensive disorders and specific subdiagnoses: HELLP syndrome, eclampsia, preeclampsia (with/without severe features), chronic hypertension, superimposed preeclampsia, and gestational hypertension.
Main Results:
- Overall, ICD-10 codes demonstrated high performance (PPV, NPV, specificity >90%; sensitivity >80%) for hypertensive disorders in pregnancy.
- High PPV, NPV, and specificity (>80%) were observed for all subdiagnoses.
- Sensitivity was high for superimposed preeclampsia, chronic hypertension, and gestational hypertension (>80%), moderate for eclampsia and HELLP syndrome, and low for preeclampsia without severe features (3.2%).
Conclusions:
- ICD-10 codes are generally reliable for identifying hypertensive disorders in pregnancy in high-burden settings.
- Specific subdiagnoses, particularly preeclampsia without severe features, show lower sensitivity.
- Provides essential bias parameters for future US-based research utilizing ICD-10 codes for hypertensive pregnancy outcomes.
Background:
Identification of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy research often uses hospital International Classification of Diseases v. 10 (ICD-10) codes meant for billing purposes, which may introduce misclassification error relative to medical records. We estimated the validity of ICD-10 codes for hypertensive disorders during pregnancy overall and by subdiagnosis, compared with medical record diagnosis, in a Southeastern United States high disease burden hospital.
Methods:
We linked medical record data with hospital discharge records for deliveries between 1 July 2016, and 30 June 2018, in an Atlanta, Georgia, public hospital. For any hypertensive disorder (with and without unspecified codes) and each subdiagnosis (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count [HELLP] syndrome, eclampsia, preeclampsia with and without severe features, chronic hypertension, superimposed preeclampsia, and gestational hypertension), we calculated positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) sensitivity, and specificity for ICD-10 codes compared with medical record diagnoses (gold standard).
Results:
Thirty-seven percent of 3,654 eligible pregnancies had a clinical diagnosis of any hypertensive disorder during pregnancy. Overall, ICD-10 codes identified medical record diagnoses well (PPV, NPV, specificity >90%; sensitivity >80%). PPV, NPV, and specificity were high for all subindicators (>80%). Sensitivity estimates were high for superimposed preeclampsia, chronic hypertension, and gestational hypertension (>80%); moderate for eclampsia (66.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 22.3%, 95.7%), HELLP (75.0%; 95% CI = 50.9%, 91.3%), and preeclampsia with severe features (58.3%; 95% CI = 52.6%, 63.8%); and low for preeclampsia without severe features (3.2%; 95% CI, 1.4%, 6.2%).
Conclusions:
We provide bias parameters for future US-based studies of hypertensive outcomes during pregnancy in high-burden populations using hospital ICD-10 codes.
Related Concept Videos
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Hypertension V: Nursing Management
Hypertension I: Introduction
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Hypertension and Regulation of Blood Pressure
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure

