Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 5, 2025
Acupoint Application as a Traditional Chinese Medicine Treatment for Fatigue Associated with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Published on: September 5, 2025
Substance Abuse Risk and Medication Monitoring in Patients with Advanced Lung Cancer Receiving Palliative Care
Pooja S Kumar1, Maureen L Saphire1, Madison Grogan1
1Pooja S. Kumar, PharmD, and Maureen L. Saphire, PharmD, are with the Department of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA. Madison Grogan is with the Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA. Jason Benedict, MS, and Sarah Janse, PhD, are with the Department of Biomedical Informatics, Center for Biostatistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA. Julia L. Agne, MD, is with the Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Palliative Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA. Erin M. Bertino, MD, and Carolyn J. Presley, MD, MHS, are with the Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Abstract:
Oncology and Palliative Medicine lack guidance on routine opioid risk screening and compliance monitoring. This study explored relationships among risk screening and aberrant medication related behaviors in patients with advanced lung cancer receiving embedded palliative care. This was a single center, prospective study and data was collected from December 2018 to March 2020. At the initial palliative visit, patients provided a baseline urine drug screen (UDS) test and completed the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients with Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R) self-assessment. Clinical pharmacists provided comprehensive review and interpretation of UDS results. Among 39 patients, 12 (30.8%) scored positive for risk of aberrant medication behaviors on the SOAPP-R. Only 34 of 39 patients provided a baseline UDS test and were included in further analysis. Prior to pharmacist review, 11/11 (100%) baseline UDS results in the positive-risk group and 13/23 (56.5%) in the negative-risk group appeared unexpected (p = 0.01). After pharmacist review, aberrant baseline UDS results were confirmed for 5/11 (45.5%) positive-risk and 4/23 (17.4%) negative-risk patients (p = 0.11). Overall, the SOAPP-R alone may be inadequate in this population and clinical pharmacists play an important role in comprehensive UDS result interpretation. Future studies are needed to validate this risk-screening tool in palliative cancer populations.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
01:30Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-V: Nursing Management
Assessment
01:27Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...
01:29Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Affecting Factors
01:28Pulmonary Tuberculosis V
Latent tuberculosis infection occurs when TB bacteria are present in a person's body, but are not causing illness or symptoms. It is not contagious, and preventive treatment is crucial to avoid the...
01:30Pneumonia V: Nursing management and Prevention
The nurse must practice strict medical asepsis and adhere to infection control guidelines to minimize healthcare-associated infections.
Enhance airway patency
Position the patient correctly to facilitate drainage of the affected lung segments. Manual or mechanical percussion and vibration can also be employed....
01:29Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-V: Management
Smoking Cessation