The long-term observation in Chinese children with monocular myelinated retinal nerve fibers, myopia and amblyopia
Yang Shen1,2,3, Jing Zhao1,2,3, Ling Sun1,2,3
1Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Background:
The syndrome of monocular myelinated retinal nerve fibers (MRNF), myopia and amblyopia threatens visual development of infants and young children. The efficacy of part-time occlusion therapy remains controversial, and the long-term prognosis of the syndrome remains unclear.
Methods:
Ten children (4.40±2.22 years, 4 boys and 6 girls) with monocular MRNF, myopia and amblyopia were recruited. Both the affected eyes (treatment group) and the fellow eyes (control group) underwent routine ophthalmic examinations, including AL, cycloplegic refraction, best-spectacles-corrected distance visual acuity (BSCDVA), cover test, simultaneous perception, corneal curvature, anterior segment and fundus examinations. Refractive error was corrected by either spectacles or rigid gas permeable (RGP) contact lenses. Part-time occlusion therapy was employed for amblyopia treatment. The retinal characteristics were examined only on the final visit with a Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT). The speed of myopia progression and axial elongation were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 20 software. Cut-off P values were 0.05.
Results:
On the final visit, six children had normal simultaneous perception but three had strabismus. The mean AL and spherical equivalent (SE) values of the affected eyes were 28.05±1.59 mm and -12.60±4.20 D, respectively, while those of the fellow eyes were 23.67±1.13 mm and -0.66±1.99 D, respectively. AL and SE were significantly different over time and between groups (P<0.0001), but no time*group interaction effect (P>0.05) was observed. The differences in the corneal curvature, mean speed of myopia progression, axial elongation, foveal thickness and parafoveal thickness between the two groups were not significant (P>0.05). However, the perifoveal thickness in the affected eyes was significantly higher than that of the control eyes (P=0.047). In the treatment group, the occlusion dosage positively correlated with the final BSCDVA (R=0.764, P=0.016) but did not correlate with the speed of myopia progression or axial elongation (both P values >0.05).
Conclusions:
The affected eyes have longer AL, severer myopia and thicker perifoveal retina when compared with the fellow eyes. Both the affected and the fellow eyes have similar speed of myopia progression as well as that of axial elongation.
