Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 5, 2025

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research
Published on: August 16, 2017
Gene action, genetic variation, and GWAS: A user-friendly web tool
Valentin Hivert1, Naomi R Wray1,2, Peter M Visscher1
1Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
This study introduces the Falconer ShinyApp, a web tool clarifying genetic variance components and their relation to complex traits. It demonstrates how additive genetic effects, not nonadditive ones like dominance and epistasis, typically explain individual differences.
Area of Science:
- Quantitative Genetics
- Genomics
- Statistical Genetics
Background:
- Fisher's partitioning of genetic variance is fundamental to understanding trait inheritance.
- Misconceptions persist regarding the role of nonadditive genetic effects (dominance, epistasis) in complex traits.
- Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWASs) increasingly rely on accurate genetic variance partitioning.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop an accessible web tool (Falconer ShinyApp) for visualizing genetic variance components.
- To illustrate the relationship between single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) effect sizes from GWAS and population-level variation.
- To clarify the contributions of gene action, allele frequencies, and interactions to genetic variance.
Main Methods:
- Development of a user-friendly web application (ShinyApp).
- Utilizing simulations to demonstrate the translation of gene action and allele frequencies into genetic variance.
- Visualizing the impact of SNP effect sizes and genetic interactions on complex traits.
Main Results:
- The Falconer ShinyApp effectively demonstrates how locus-specific effects contribute to individual trait differences.
- Nonadditive genetic effects (dominance and epistasis) generally account for a smaller proportion of genetic variance compared to additive effects.
- Interactions between loci typically do not significantly explain individual differences in complex traits.
Conclusions:
- The developed web tool aids in understanding fundamental concepts of quantitative genetics and GWAS.
- Additive genetic variance is often the primary driver of individual differences in complex traits.
- Clarification of nonadditive genetic effects' limited role improves the interpretation of GWAS findings.
More Related Videos
07:15Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation
Published on: January 16, 2019
09:37Navigating MARRVEL, a Web-Based Tool that Integrates Human Genomics and Model Organism Genetics Information
Published on: August 15, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Genetic Variation
Genes exist in different versions called alleles,...
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
Genetic Screens
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which...
Gene Conversion
Genome Annotation and Assembly