Assessment of the FilmArray ME panel in 4199 consecutively tested cerebrospinal fluid samples

Johan Lindström1, Kristina Elfving2, Magnus Lindh3

  • 1Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Department of Infectious Diseases, Gothenburg, Sweden; Institute of Biomedicine, Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Abstract

Insights

The FilmArray meningitis/encephalitis (ME) panel shows good performance for diagnosing central nervous system infections. However, potential false-negative results for herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) require further investigation in encephalitis cases.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical microbiology
  • Infectious disease diagnostics
  • Molecular diagnostics

Background:

  • Central nervous system (CNS) infections necessitate prompt and accurate diagnosis for effective management.
  • Rapid syndromic panel testing offers a potential avenue for guiding clinical decisions.
  • The FilmArray meningitis/encephalitis (ME) panel utilizes multiplex PCR to detect 14 common pathogens.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the performance of the FilmArray ME panel against established diagnostic methods, particularly real-time quantitative PCR for viral detection.
  • To assess the diagnostic and clinical significance of any discrepancies observed between the ME panel and reference methods.
  • To determine the accuracy of the ME panel for individual pathogens commonly found in CNS infections.

Main Methods:

  • Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples submitted for viral diagnostics were analyzed using both the ME panel and in-house real-time PCR for specific viruses (HSV-1, HSV-2, VZV, enteroviruses).
  • Pathogens detected by the ME panel were confirmed using standard laboratory diagnostic procedures.
  • Discrepant results were thoroughly investigated by analyzing biological and clinical data to ascertain accuracy.

Main Results:

  • The ME panel detected 315 pathogens in 4199 CSF samples (7.5% prevalence), with an additional 21 viral targets identified by real-time PCR.
  • A total of 55 discrepant results were noted, with 20 false-positive and 21 false-negative results remaining after analysis.
  • Specific performance issues included a sensitivity of 82.4% for HSV-1 (with 3 false-negatives), 13 false-negative enterovirus results, and 8 false-positive Streptococcus pneumoniae results.

Conclusions:

  • The FilmArray ME panel demonstrates good overall performance in the diagnosis of CNS infections.
  • The observed risk of false-negative results for herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) indicates a need for supplementary testing when encephalitis is clinically suspected.
  • Interpretation challenges with enterovirus and Streptococcus pneumoniae results highlight limitations that warrant consideration in clinical practice.

Related Concept Videos