Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

8.5K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
8.5K
Cluster Sampling Method01:20

Cluster Sampling Method

13.4K
Appropriate sampling methods ensure that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
13.4K
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

45
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to...
45
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

48
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
48
Blinding01:11

Blinding

3.6K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
3.6K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

190
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
190

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Proportional Hazards Regression for Interval-Censored Outcomes With an Interval-Censored Covariate.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Handling incomplete outcomes and covariates in cluster-randomized trials: doubly robust estimation, efficiency considerations, and sensitivity analysis.

Biometrics·2026
Same author

Assessing the Benefit of Specialist Palliative Care in Oncology: Rethinking Clinical Trial Design.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·2025
Same author

Network generalized estimating equations for complexly correlated data with applications to cluster randomized trials.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2025
Same author

Multisite Randomized Trial of Inpatient Palliative Care Intervention for Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·2025
Same author

Permutation tests for detecting treatment effect heterogeneity in cluster randomized trials.

Statistical methods in medical research·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 4, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.8K

Randomization-based inference for a marginal treatment effect in stepped wedge cluster randomized trials.

Dustin J Rabideau1,2, Rui Wang3,4

  • 1Biostatistics Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Statistics in Medicine
|May 21, 2021
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a new method for analyzing stepped wedge cluster randomized trials (SWTs) using randomization-based inference. The approach improves confidence interval calculations for treatment effects, especially with non-continuous outcomes.

Keywords:
confidence intervalpermutation testrandomization-based inferencestepped wedge cluster randomized trialstratified randomization

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

848
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 4, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.8K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

848
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.5K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Stepped wedge cluster randomized trials (SWTs) are increasingly used in public health research.
  • Randomization-based inference offers advantages for SWT analysis, avoiding parametric assumptions.
  • Current methods for calculating confidence intervals (CIs) in SWTs with non-continuous outcomes are limited.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel framework for calculating randomization-based p-values and CIs for marginal treatment effects in SWTs.
  • To address limitations in existing methods for non-continuous outcomes and varying cluster sizes.
  • To evaluate the impact of study design features like stratified randomization on analysis methods.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a framework using individual-level generalized linear models for test statistics.
  • Calculation of randomization-based p-values and CIs for marginal treatment effects.
  • Reanalysis of the XpertMTB/RIF tuberculosis trial data to illustrate and compare methods.

Main Results:

  • The proposed framework provides a robust method for randomization-based inference in SWTs.
  • The approach effectively calculates p-values and CIs for non-continuous outcomes.
  • The study demonstrates the influence of design features, such as stratification, on analysis outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • The new framework enhances the analysis of SWTs, particularly for non-continuous outcomes.
  • This method offers improved efficiency and accuracy in estimating treatment effects.
  • The findings contribute to more reliable statistical inference in complex trial designs.