Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 4, 2025
Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment
Published on: February 23, 2024
Efficiency and outcome quality of Herbst-Multibracket appliance therapy in Class II:2 patients
Niko Christian Bock1, Sophia Killat2, Sabine Ruf1
1Department of Orthodontics, University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Objectives:
The aim of this retrospective investigation was to generate representative data on the efficiency and outcome quality of Class II:2 Herbst-Multibracket appliance (Herbst-MBA) treatment.
Subjects And Methods:
All Class II:2 patients who had started Herbst-MBA treatment at the study centre since 1986 were included. Study casts from before treatment, after Herbst-MBA treatment, and (if available) after ≥24 months of follow-up were evaluated using standard occlusal variables, the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR)-Index, and the Ahlgren-Scale.
Results:
During treatment, the pre-treatment PAR score was reduced from 23.6 ± 7.66 to 5.6 ± 3.85 (n = 192); during the follow-up period, a slight increase to 6.0 ± 3.60 occurred (n = 127). The percentage of patients who could be assigned to the PAR category 'greatly improved' was 30% after treatment and 33% after follow-up; only 1%, respectively, 2% had to be assigned to the category 'worse/no different'. The outcome ratings according to the Ahlgren-Scale revealed 20% excellent, 32% good, 46% acceptable, and 2% unsuccessful results.
Limitations:
Retrospective study design with follow-up data not available from all subjects and no data from untreated controls.
Conclusions:
Herbst-MBA is an efficient treatment approach in orthodontic care of Class II:2 malocclusions. High-quality results (mean/median PAR score: 5.6/5.0) with very good short-term stability (2.2 years' follow-up) were achieved. Unfortunately, no appropriate control group or groups, where other treatment approaches had been applied, exist.
