Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Osmoregulation in Fishes02:32

Osmoregulation in Fishes

51.6K
When cells are placed in a hypotonic (low-salt) fluid, they can swell and burst. Meanwhile, cells in a hypertonic solution—with a higher salt concentration—can shrivel and die. How do fish cells avoid these gruesome fates in hypotonic freshwater or hypertonic seawater environments?
51.6K
Gradually Varying Flow01:29

Gradually Varying Flow

187
Gradually varying flow (GVF) in open channels describes situations where water depth changes slowly along the channel due to factors like non-uniform bed slope, channel shape variations, or obstructions. This flow type occurs when the depth adjusts gradually to balance gravitational forces, shear forces, and energy requirements, resulting in a low rate of depth change.Characteristics of Gradually Varying FlowGVF is commonly observed in natural streams, rivers, and canals, where flow depth...
187
Rapidly Varying Flow01:24

Rapidly Varying Flow

192
Rapidly varying flow (RVF) in open channels is characterized by abrupt changes in flow depth over a short distance, with the rate of depth change relative to distance often approaching unity. These flows are inherently complex due to their transient and multi-dimensional nature, making exact analysis difficult. However, approximate solutions using simplified models provide valuable insights into their behavior.Key Features of Rapidly Varying FlowRVF is commonly observed in scenarios involving...
192
Responses to Drought and Flooding02:41

Responses to Drought and Flooding

11.3K
Water plays a significant role in the life cycle of plants. However, insufficient or excess of water can be detrimental and pose a serious threat to plants.
11.3K
Gene Flow02:39

Gene Flow

36.4K
Gene flow is the transfer of genes among populations, resulting from either the dispersal of gametes or from the migration of individuals.
36.4K
Regulation of Water Output01:26

Regulation of Water Output

1.5K
The human body predominantly expels water through the urinary system. On average, an individual generates around 1.5 liters of urine each day. This amount can fluctuate based on how well a person is hydrated, but a critical minimum quantity of urine must be produced to ensure the body's proper functioning. Daily, the kidneys remove 600 to 1200 milliosmoles of dissolved substances, effectively excreting excess minerals and water-soluble toxins such as creatinine, urea, and uric acid from the...
1.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Hydrologic variability drives environmental and geospatial relationships in Smallmouth Bass (Micropterus dolomieu) distribution.

The Science of the total environment·2026
Same author

Fish beta diversity associated with hydrologic and anthropogenic disturbance gradients in contrasting stream flow regimes.

The Science of the total environment·2024
Same author

Drought and nutrient pollution produce multiple interactive effects in stream ecosystems.

PloS one·2022
Same author

Modeling effects of disturbance across life history strategies of stream fishes.

Oecologia·2021
Same author

Predicting hydrologic disturbance of streams using species occurrence data.

The Science of the total environment·2019
Same author

Flow alteration-ecology relationships in Ozark Highland streams: Consequences for fish, crayfish and macroinvertebrate assemblages.

The Science of the total environment·2019

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 4, 2025

Continuous Instream Monitoring of Nutrients and Sediment in Agricultural Watersheds
12:50

Continuous Instream Monitoring of Nutrients and Sediment in Agricultural Watersheds

Published on: September 26, 2017

11.5K

Hydrologic variation influences stream fish assemblage dynamics through flow regime and drought.

Daniel D Magoulick1, Matthew P Dekar2, Shawn W Hodges2

  • 1U.S. Geological Survey, Arkansas Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, 72701, USA. danmag@uark.edu.

Scientific Reports
|May 22, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Hydrologic variation significantly impacts stream fish. Highly variable flow regimes led to lower fish assemblage stability, especially during drought, highlighting the need to consider flow alterations for biodiversity conservation.

More Related Videos

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems
07:41

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems

Published on: July 30, 2019

7.7K
Visualizing Hyporheic Flow Through Bedforms Using Dye Experiments and Simulation
09:49

Visualizing Hyporheic Flow Through Bedforms Using Dye Experiments and Simulation

Published on: November 18, 2015

12.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 4, 2025

Continuous Instream Monitoring of Nutrients and Sediment in Agricultural Watersheds
12:50

Continuous Instream Monitoring of Nutrients and Sediment in Agricultural Watersheds

Published on: September 26, 2017

11.5K
Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems
07:41

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems

Published on: July 30, 2019

7.7K
Visualizing Hyporheic Flow Through Bedforms Using Dye Experiments and Simulation
09:49

Visualizing Hyporheic Flow Through Bedforms Using Dye Experiments and Simulation

Published on: November 18, 2015

12.4K

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Hydrology
  • Ichthyology

Background:

  • Stream fish assemblages are structured by hydrologic variation.
  • Flow regimes influence the relationship between stream hydrology and fish biology.
  • Understanding these dynamics is crucial for aquatic biodiversity conservation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To test the hypothesis that variable flow regimes result in lower species richness, higher turnover, lower assemblage stability, and stronger abiotic-fish relationships compared to stable flow regimes.
  • To investigate the influence of hydrologic variation on fish assemblage structure and dynamics in Ozark streams.

Main Methods:

  • Seasonal sampling of fish assemblages in Runoff/Intermittent Flashy (variable flow) and Groundwater Flashy (stable flow) streams over two years (drought and wet).
  • Backpack electrofishing and three-pass removal techniques to estimate fish species richness, abundance, and density.
  • Mixed-effects models and redundancy analysis to assess relationships between hydrology, habitat, season, and fish assemblage characteristics.

Main Results:

  • Fish species richness and abundance were relatively stable, but densities fluctuated with habitat volume.
  • Hydrologic variation, not flow regime, influenced seasonal relationships between fish and habitat.
  • Seasonal fish species turnover was higher in the drought year.
  • Assemblage stability was lower in variable flow streams during the drought year.
  • Fish species densities were clearly separated by flow regime, with distinct species groups (periodic, opportunistic, equilibrium) characterizing each stream type.

Conclusions:

  • Spatial and temporal hydrologic variation strongly influences fish assemblage dynamics in Ozark streams.
  • More hydrologically variable streams exhibit lower assemblage stability and greater density fluctuations.
  • Understanding hydrologic variation's impact on fish assemblages is vital for biodiversity conservation.
  • Future research should address the effects of altered hydrologic variation on biotic assemblages.