Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 4, 2025
Cone Beam Intraoperative Computed Tomography-based Image Guidance for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion
Published on: August 6, 2019
Clinical impact of intraoperative cone beam tomography and navigation for displaced acetabular fractures: a
Maroun Rizkallah1,2,3, Amer Sebaaly4, Elias Melhem5
1Orthopedic Surgery Department, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph, 185, Rue Raymond Losserand, Paris, 75014, France. maroun.rizkallah@gmail.com.
Introduction:
The use of per-operative cone beam tomography imaging for displaced acetabular fractures yields increased post-operative articular reduction accuracy. This study evaluates the need for total hip replacement (THR) and hip-related functional outcomes in patients with displaced acetabular fractures treated with O-ARM guidance compared to those treated under C-ARM guidance.
Materials And Methods:
This is a prospective matched cohort study. Adult patients (35) with acetabular fractures operated under O-ARM guidance were included. These were matched (age, fracture type) to classically treated patients (35) from our data base. The primary outcome was the need for THR during three year follow-up period. Secondary outcomes were functional scores [Harris Hip score (HHS), Postel-Merle d'Aubigné (PMA)] and hip osteoarthritis grade at three year follow-up. Correlation between reduction gap and THR was evaluated.
Results:
At three years, five patients were lost to follow-up in O-ARM group and four in control group. Two patients (6.66%) in the O-ARM group needed THR compared to eight patients in controls (25.80%) (p = 0.046). Hip X-ray osteoarthritis grade averaged 0.00 in patients without THR in O-ARM group compared to 0.22 in patients without THR in controls (p = 0.008). HHS averaged 95.79 in patients without THR in O-ARM group, compared to 93.82 in patients without THR in the control group (p = 0.41%). PMA averaged 17.25 in patients without THR in the O-ARM group compared to 17.04 in patients without THR in group 2 (p = 0.37). Evaluation of correlation between reduction gap and THR rate yielded OR = 1.22 (1.06-1.45).
Discussion:
Increased accuracy in articular reduction, with per-operative three-dimensional control of impaction, in acetabular fractures led to significantly less need for THR in patients treated under O-ARM. Patients in both groups are comparable for functional outcomes because those with the lowest scores were offered THR. Per-operative cone beam guidance and navigation use are recommended in tertiary referral centres for acetabular trauma.
