On the balance between practical relevance and standardization - Testing the effects of zinc and pyrene on native...

Soils are among the most densely inhabited and biodiverse habitats on our planet, and many important soil ecosystem services depend on the health condition of the native soil fauna. Anthropogenic stress such as chemical pollution acting on the native soil fauna might jeopardize these functions. Laboratory microcosm tests are an appropriate tool for assessing the risk of chemicals on the native soil fauna and can be regarded as intermediate tier tests, bridging the gap between single species toxicity tests and field testing. Nematodes are one of the most abundant and divers soil invertebrates, and as such native nematode communities might be suitable for ecotoxicological assessments in laboratory microcosm set ups. In order to test such a small-scale (30 g soil) microcosm system, two different chemicals (zinc and pyrene) were assessed in various soil types for their effects on the respective native nematode communities. Various community parameters such as total nematode density, genus richness and genus composition, as well as trait-related indices (e.g. maturity index) were monitored over a period of 8-10 weeks. The response of the nematode communities strongly varied between soil types, and these differences were more pronounced for Zn than for pyrene. Interestingly, the structure of the respective native nematode communities was shown to play a larger role for explaining the varying toxic effects than soil properties governing the bioavailability of the spiked chemicals. We demonstrated that exposure of natural nematode communities in their original soil matrix to the metal zinc and to pyrene under climatically highly controlled conditions resulted in quantitatively and qualitatively distinct responses. Upon comparison of various community indices, the maturity index was shown to be the most sensitive toxicity endpoint for all tested soils and chemicals.