Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 4, 2025

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm
Published on: December 9, 2012
Identifying 'win-win-win' futures from inequitable value chain trade-offs: A system dynamics approach
Gregory S Cooper1, Karl M Rich2, Bhavani Shankar3
1Centre for Development, Environment and Policy (CeDEP), School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS), London, United Kingdom.
Upgrades to food systems can create unintended trade-offs between farmers and consumers. Achieving "win-win-win" outcomes requires more than internal changes to aggregation schemes, necessitating broader environmental support.
Area of Science:
- Agricultural Economics
- System Dynamics Modeling
- Sustainable Food Systems
Background:
- Food systems require adaptation for sustainability and equity, particularly in developing countries.
- Focus is shifting from producer-centric value chains to consumer-level availability and affordability of nutritious foods.
- Agricultural value chains are complex, with potential for unintended producer-consumer trade-offs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a system dynamics model to analyze value chain trade-offs in horticultural aggregation schemes.
- To identify "win-win-win" scenarios benefiting fruit and vegetable availability, farmer profits, and organizational sustainability.
- To evaluate the impact of internal aggregation upgrades and external enabling environment changes.
Main Methods:
- System dynamics modeling framework applied to the 'Loop' horticultural aggregation scheme in Bihar, India.
- Simulation of production, aggregation, marketing, and retailing processes.
- Exploration of 5000 Monte Carlo trajectories for two internal and two external upgrade scenarios.
Main Results:
- Internal aggregation upgrades alone do not guarantee "win-win-win" futures.
- Narrow scenarios exist where increased supply to retail markets also supports farmer profits.
- Scaling aggregation and introducing cold storage can lead to unintended negative producer-consumer trade-offs.
Conclusions:
- System dynamics modeling can capture complex value chain dynamics and trade-offs.
- Identifying "win-win-win" futures requires considering both internal dynamics and external scenarios.
- Careful planning is needed to mitigate unintended consequences in food system upgrades.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Dynamic Equilibrium
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
Equity Theory
Solution Equilibrium and Saturation
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Principle of Virtual Work: Problem Solving
To apply the principle of virtual work,...

