Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 4, 2025

Author Spotlight: Creating a Versatile Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis Model Relevant for Both Male and Female Mice
Published on: October 13, 2023
OCT Variability Prevents Their Use as Robust Biomarkers in Multiple Sclerosis
Marta Para-Prieto1,2, Raul Martin1,3,4, Sara Crespo2
1Universidad de Valladolid, Instituto Universitario de Oftalmobiología Aplicada (IOBA Eye Institute), Valladolid, 47011, Spain.
Spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) instruments show varying agreement in measuring retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) and foveal thickness (FT) in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. Device differences require standardization for accurate MS assessment.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Neuroscience
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a demyelinating disease affecting the central nervous system.
- Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) is crucial for assessing neurodegeneration in MS.
- Peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) and foveal thickness (FT) are key biomarkers in MS.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the agreement of pRNFL and FT measurements across three different Spectral Domain-Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) devices.
- To compare measurement consistency in healthy individuals and multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, including those with a history of optic neuritis (ON).
Main Methods:
- An observational cross-sectional study involving healthy subjects and MS patients (with and without prior ON).
- Measurements of pRNFL and FT were performed using three SD-OCT instruments: OCT PRIMUS 200, OCT CIRRUS 500, and OCT 3D 2000.
- Statistical analysis to assess agreement between devices and differences between patient groups.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in pRNFL and FT were found between healthy subjects and MS patients without ON across all instruments.
- MS patients with a history of ON exhibited significantly thinner pRNFL and FT (P<0.01) compared to controls.
- OCT PRIMUS and CIRRUS demonstrated better agreement for pRNFL and FT measurements in both healthy and MS eyes, while OCT 3D showed lower agreement with CIRRUS.
Conclusions:
- While SD-OCT is valuable for MS patient assessment, significant inter-device variability exists.
- Differences in measurement accuracy among SD-OCT devices necessitate careful consideration in clinical practice.
- Standardization of measurement conditions and establishment of normative databases are essential for reliable international MS research and patient monitoring.
Related Concept Videos
Variability: Analysis
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests

