Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 4, 2025

Surgical Swine Model of Chronic Cardiac Ischemia Treated by Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Published on: March 27, 2018
Long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions within coronary artery bypass grafts
Rafał Januszek1, Zbigniew Siudak2, Artur Dziewierz3,4
1Department of Clinical Rehabilitation, University of Physical Education, Krakow, Poland.
Insights
Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in bypasses have poor outcomes. PCI of two or more bypasses, post-dilatation, and no-reflow independently predict worse long-term clinical outcomes in these patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Vascular Surgery
Background:
- Long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) in coronary artery bypasses are inferior to those in native coronary arteries.
- Identifying predictors of adverse events after PCI in bypasses is crucial for improving patient management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess predictors of long-term clinical outcomes following percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) of coronary artery bypasses.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 194 patients undergoing PCI of coronary artery bypasses was analyzed.
- The primary endpoint included target-vessel revascularization, target-lesion revascularization, myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary artery bypass grafting, and death.
- Multivariate analysis identified independent predictors of study endpoints during a mean follow-up of 964 days.
Main Results:
- The primary endpoint occurred in 59.7% of patients.
- Independent predictors of worse outcomes identified by Cox multivariate analysis included PCI of two or more bypasses (p < 0.01), post-dilatation (p < 0.05), and no-reflow (p < 0.05).
- Anti-embolic protection devices showed no significant impact on long-term outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Percutaneous coronary interventions involving two or more bypasses are associated with worse long-term outcomes.
- Post-dilatation and no-reflow phenomena are significant predictors of adverse events after PCI in coronary bypass grafts.
- These findings highlight key factors influencing the success of PCI in bypass grafts.
Introduction:
The long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) within coronary artery bypasses are still poor as compared to those within native coronary arteries. Thus, we aimed to assess predictors of long-term clinical outcomes after PCIs of coronary bypasses.
Material And Methods:
We enrolled 194 patients after PCIs of coronary artery bypasses at the mean age of 69.5 ±8.3 years (73.2% male). The primary study endpoint was a combination of target-vessel revascularization (TVR), target-lesion revascularization (TLR), myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and death. The mean follow-up was 964 ±799.1 days and was completed among 156 patients. Multivariate analysis was used to assess determinants of study endpoints during follow-up. Moreover, we compared survival curves according to the type of PCI and presence of anti-embolic protection.
Results:
The primary endpoint of the study occurred in 59.7% of patients after the mean time of 669.6 ±598.7 days. The TVR occurred in 37.9% of individuals, TLR in 24.2%, MI in 26.3%, stroke in 4.2%, CABG in 2.1% and death in 30.5% of patients. In Cox multivariate analysis, PCI of two or more bypasses (p < 0.01), post-dilatation (p < 0.05) and no-reflow (p < 0.05) were the independent determinants of the primary study endpoint. No significant impact of anti-embolic protection devices on long-term outcomes was observed.
Conclusions:
Percutaneous coronary interventions of two or more bypasses, post-dilatation and no-reflow are predictors of worse outcome in patients undergoing PCI within coronary artery bypass grafts.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care

