Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 4, 2025
An Intramedullary Locking Nail for Standardized Fixation of Femur Osteotomies to Analyze Normal and Defective Bone Healing in Mice
Published on: November 13, 2016
Association of Gap Healing With Angle of Correction After Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy Without Bone Grafting
Hyung Jun Park1, Seung-Baik Kang1, Moon Jong Chang1
1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Background:
Studies have reported that opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) without bone grafting has outcomes that are similar to or even better than those of OWHTO with bone grafting, especially after use of a locking plate. However, a consensus on managing the gap after OWHTO has not been established.
Purpose:
To determine the degree of gap healing achieved without bone grafting, the factors associated with gap healing, and whether additional gap healing would be obtained after plate removal.
Study Design:
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods:
This retrospective study included 73 patients who underwent OWHTO without bone grafting between 2015 and 2018. Patients in the study were divided into 2 groups based on the correction angle: small correction group (<10°; SC group) and large correction group (≥10°; LC group). The locking plate used in OWHTO was removed at a mean of 13.5 months after surgery in 65 patients. Radiographic indexes were measured: gap filling height, gap vacancy ratio (GVR), and osteotomy filling index. The acceptable gap healing was defined as an osteotomy filling index ≥3. The factors related to gap healing around the osteotomy site were selected after multicollinearity analysis.
Results:
Although both groups achieved acceptable gap healing regardless of the correction angle, the SC group showed higher and earlier gap healing than did the LC group (gap healing rate 81.4% in the SC group vs 41.7% in the LC group at 3 months postoperatively). The GVR was 8.6% in the SC group and 15.3% in the LC group at 12 months after surgery (P = .005). Both the amount of time that elapsed after surgery and the correction angle were associated with gap healing (P < .05). Additional gap healing was observed after plate removal, as the GVR decreased 2.7% more in the patients with plate removal than in patients who did not have plate removal (P = .012).
Conclusion:
All patients achieved acceptable gap healing without bone graft. The degree of gap healing was higher in the SC group and increased over time. Gap healing was promoted after plate removal. Considering the results of this study, a bone graft is not necessary in routine OWHTO in terms of gap healing.
