Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 4, 2025

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
The development and validation of the Multidimensional Paternal Perinatal Scale (MPPS)
Daisy Gemayel1, Karl K K Wiener1, Anthony Saliba1
1Charles Sturt University, Locked Bag 588, Wagga Wagga, NSW, 2678, Australia.
Insights
A new scale, the Multidimensional Paternal Perinatal Scale (MPPS), was developed to assess fathers' emotional well-being precursors during the perinatal period. The MPPS demonstrates adequate content validity and reliability for identifying at-risk fathers.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Perinatal Health
- Measurement Development
Background:
- Limited screening tools exist for fathers' perinatal emotional well-being.
- Existing measures focus on clinical symptoms, not precursors.
- A paternal perinatal conceptual framework guided development.
Purpose of the Study:
- Develop and validate the Multidimensional Paternal Perinatal Scale (MPPS).
- Identify precursors impacting fathers' emotional well-being.
- Create antenatal and postnatal versions of the scale.
Main Methods:
- Item development from literature and qualitative data.
- Content validity analysis (qualitative and quantitative judgment).
- Inter-rater reliability assessment.
- Exploratory factor analysis.
Main Results:
- Developed antenatal (75 items, 11 precursors) and postnatal (103 items, 13 precursors) MPPS versions.
- High Content Validity Index (CVI) for clarity and relevance (antenatal: .95/.99; postnatal: .98/.93).
- Acceptable inter-rater reliability (AC2 = .67) and internal consistency.
- Factor analysis supported construct validity for both versions.
Conclusions:
- The MPPS demonstrates adequate content validity and inter-rater reliability.
- The scale effectively characterizes antecedents of emotional well-being in fathers.
- MPPS can identify fathers at risk for poor emotional well-being antenatally and postnatally.
Abstract:
The limited availability of screening tools for assessing fathers' emotional well-being during the perinatal period warrants the development of a new measure, especially since the existing measurements did not specifically focus on fathers' perinatal experiences. These existing measurements focus on the assessment of clinical symptoms rather than precursors that may negatively impact on perinatal father's well-being. Based on the paternal perinatal conceptual framework, the Multidimensional Paternal Perinatal Scale (MPPS) was developed to identify precursors that contribute to the father's emotional well-being during the perinatal period. This paper examines three steps of measurement development. The first step comprised item development based on the literature and qualitative findings. The second step comprised conducting the qualitative and quantitative judgment analysis of the MPPS content validity. The third step assessed inter-rater reliability. Two versions of the MPPS were developed: the antenatal and postnatal versions. The antenatal version of the MPPS includes 75 items and targets 11 precursors of paternal perinatal emotional well-being, while the postnatal version includes 103 items and targets 13 precursors of poor emotional well-being. The validity analysis showed that both the antenatal and postnatal subscales met content validity requirements. The overall Content Validity Index (CVI) of the antenatal version was equal to .95 for clarity and .99 for relevance, while the postnatal version showed a CVI of .98 for clarity and .93 for relevance. The inter-rater reliability for each of the antenatal and postnatal versions of the MPPS showed an AC2 of .67. The exploratory factor analysis derived a five-factor solution for the ANT-MPPS, and eight-factor solution for POST-MPPS. Both versions of the MPPS showed acceptable internal consistency. Overall, the findings showed adequate indices for content validity and inter-rater reliability of the new Multidimensional Paternal Perinatal Scales. Additionally, the MPPS demonstrated an acceptable construct validity and internal consistency. Results demonstrate that both versions of the scale successfully characterised antecedents of emotional well-being and as such can be used to identify fathers at risk of poor emotional well-being in the antenatal and postnatal environments.
More Related Videos
07:56Assessing the Coherence of Parents' Short Narratives Regarding their Child Using the Five-Minute Speech Sample Procedure
Published on: September 19, 2019
06:39Using a Murine Model of Psychosocial Stress in Pregnancy as a Translationally Relevant Paradigm for Psychiatric Disorders in Mothers and Infants
Published on: June 13, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Parenting Styles
Authoritarian Parenting
This style is strict and controlling, with little room for open dialogue. Authoritarian parents demand obedience and often enforce rules with minimal warmth. Children raised this way may lack social skills and initiative, usually comparing themselves to others unfavorably.
Authoritative...
Three Developmental Domains
Physical Development
Physical processes, also known as maturation, encompass the biological changes that occur across an individual's life. These changes begin with genetic inheritance and continue through various stages, including growth in height and weight,...
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...