Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 4, 2025

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Drug Sensitization In Vitro and In Vivo
Published on: February 6, 2015
Evaluation of Oncology Trial Results Reporting Over a 10-Year Period
Xu Liu1,2, Yuan Zhang1,2, Wen-Fei Li1
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Importance:
Unreported clinical trial results represent a violation of human rights. Oncology trials account for nearly 30% of interventional biopharmaceutical clinical studies registered on ClinicalTrials.gov and are the most numerous among all disciplines.
Objective:
To analyze the reporting of results among all interventional oncology trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov from 2007 through 2017.
Design, Setting, And Participants:
This cohort study analyzed all clinical studies registered between June 1, 2007, and May 8, 2017, on ClinicalTrials.gov, the largest public clinical trial registry in the world. Trials with a recruitment status of completed or terminated and a primary completion date of on or before September 30, 2017, were selected. Data were analyzed between February 20, 2021, and February 26, 2021.
Main Outcomes And Measures:
The main outcome was the percentage of trials that reported results either on ClinicalTrials.gov or in journal publications within 24 months of the primary completion date. Journal publication was ascertained by searching ClinicalTrials.gov for a link to the publication, PubMed using national clinical trial number, and Embase using national clinical trial number and filters.
Results:
Of the 12 240 clinical trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, 7425 trials (60.7%; 95% CI, 60.0%-61.5%) reported results, with a 34.0% (95% CI, 30.3%-37.7%) increase in 24-month reporting rate from 2007 to 2017. Multivariable analyses confirmed that more recent trials (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.11 per year increase; 95% CI, 1.10-1.13) and trials with larger sample sizes (51-100 patients: adjusted HR, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.09-1.24]; >100 patients: adjusted HR, 1.43 [95% CI, 1.33-1.54]) were more likely to report results. Terminated trials were less likely to report results compared with completed trials (adjusted HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.83-0.93). Compared with trials funded by industry, those funded by the National Institutes of Health were more likely to report results (adjusted HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.29-1.49), whereas those funded by other academic or nonprofit organizations were less likely to report results (adjusted HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.62-0.70). Among all 7425 trials, the results of 2807 trials (37.8%; 95% CI, 36.7%-38.9%) were posted only on ClinicalTrials.gov. These trials tended to be terminated early and to have small sample sizes (≤50 patients) compared with trials that published results in journals.
Conclusions And Relevance:
This study found a gradual improvement in results reporting among oncology trials over a 10-year period. Trial registries could serve as a results reporting platform for unpublished trials and as a data source of trial outcomes for future studies.
Insights
Reporting of clinical trial results for oncology studies improved over a decade, with registries offering a platform for unpublished data. This enhances transparency and patient rights in cancer research.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Clinical Trials
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Unreported clinical trial results violate human rights.
- Oncology trials constitute a significant portion of biopharmaceutical studies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the reporting rates of interventional oncology trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov between 2007 and 2017.
Main Methods:
- A cohort study analyzed 12,240 oncology trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov.
- Results reporting was assessed within 24 months of trial completion.
- Publication data was verified through ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, and Embase.
Main Results:
- 60.7% of trials reported results, with a 34% increase in reporting rates from 2007-2017.
- Factors influencing reporting included trial recency, sample size, funding source, and completion status.
- 37.8% of reported results were posted only on ClinicalTrials.gov, often for terminated or small trials.
Conclusions:
- Oncology trial results reporting has gradually improved over ten years.
- Clinical trial registries can serve as platforms for reporting unpublished results.
- Registries can also function as valuable data sources for future research.
More Related Videos
06:46Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
04:53A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Longitudinal Research