Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparison between percutaneous nephrolithotomy and open stone procedures.

N R Netto1, G C Lemos, J F De Almeida Claro

  • 1Division of Urology, University of Campinas Medical School Unicamp, São Paulo, Brazil.

International Urology and Nephrology
|January 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Three dimensional anatomy and virtual surgery for transobturator approach].

Actas urologicas espanolas·2007
Same author

Intermittent androgen replacement for intense hypogonadism symptoms in castrated patients.

Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases·2005
Same author

[SAFYRE. A new concept for adjustable minimally invasive sling for female urinary stress incontinence].

Actas urologicas espanolas·2005
Same author

Urethral resistance measurement: a new method for evaluation of stress urinary incontinence in women.

International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction·2004
Same author

Routine ureteral stenting after ureteroscopy for ureteral lithiasis: is it really necessary?

The Journal of urology·2001
Same author

Is transurethral vaporization a remake of transurethral resection of the prostate?

Journal of endourology·1999
Same journal

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials: low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy (Li-ESWT) for erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy.

International urology and nephrology·2026
Same journal

Multiparametric MRI-derived radiomic signatures enable noninvasive prediction of HER2 expression in bladder cancer.

International urology and nephrology·2026
Same journal

Does WHO/ISUP grade IV histology provide prognostic insight in chromophobe renal cell carcinoma?

International urology and nephrology·2026
Same journal

Age-stratified association between blood pressure and clinical outcomes in maintenance hemodialysis patients.

International urology and nephrology·2026
Same journal

Management and implementation of intermittent catheterisation in neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction: a clinical practice guideline in Germany - update 3.0.

International urology and nephrology·2026
Same journal

Interpreting short-term eGFR improvement with telitacicept in IgA nephropathy.

International urology and nephrology·2026
See all related articles

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy offers faster recovery and less disability for kidney stone removal compared to traditional flank or posterior incisions. This minimally invasive approach reduces hospitalization and pain medication needs.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Surgical Procedures
  • Nephrolithiasis Management

Background:

  • Kidney stone extraction surgery is a common urological procedure.
  • Traditional methods include flank and posterior incisions.
  • Minimally invasive techniques are being explored for improved patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy and patient recovery of percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus traditional incision methods for kidney stone removal.
  • To evaluate operative time, hospitalization duration, recuperation period, and pain management.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 205 patients undergoing kidney stone extraction.
  • Categorization into three surgical groups: flank incision (70 patients), posterior incision (20 patients), and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (80 patients).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of key clinical outcomes including hospitalization, operative time, recuperation, and narcotic drug demand.

    • Main Results:

    • Percutaneous nephrolithotomy group experienced shorter hospitalization and operative times.
    • Patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy had a significantly reduced recuperation period.
    • Lower demand for narcotic drugs was observed in the percutaneous nephrolithotomy group, indicating less pain.

    Conclusions:

    • Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is associated with improved patient recovery and reduced disability.
    • This minimally invasive technique offers advantages over traditional incision methods for kidney stone surgery.
    • Percutaneous nephrolithotomy facilitates an earlier return to work and decreased patient morbidity.