Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

4.1K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
4.1K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

7.5K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
7.5K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

393
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
393

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How the public evaluates various sources of scientific information: A descriptive examination.

Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)·2026
Same author

Too close to trust: Message features, resistance, and greenwashing in green advertising.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
Same author

Brain activity explains message effectiveness: A mega-analysis of 16 neuroimaging studies.

PNAS nexus·2025
Same author

Political Humor, Sharing, and Remembering: Insights from Neuroimaging.

The Journal of communication·2025
Same author

Science populism impacts perceptions of credibility across scientific professions.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Using a signal detection approach to understand the impacts of processing fluency and efficacy on accuracy in misinformation detection.

Frontiers in psychology·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 4, 2025

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills
09:27

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills

Published on: January 19, 2024

1.5K

Eye Movements Predict Large-Scale Voting Decisions.

Jason C Coronel1, Olivia M Bullock1, Hillary C Shulman1

  • 1School of Communication, The Ohio State University.

Psychological Science
|May 25, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Eye movements during reading ballot measures predict voting behavior. Difficulties in understanding ballot language, as shown by eye movements, correlate with abstaining from voting and voting against measures in large-scale elections.

Keywords:
decision makingdirect democracyeye movementsopen dataopen materialspreregisteredvoting

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: An Accurate and Quantitative Approach to Study Visual Feature Selectivity of the Optokinetic Reflex in Mice
09:28

Author Spotlight: An Accurate and Quantitative Approach to Study Visual Feature Selectivity of the Optokinetic Reflex in Mice

Published on: June 23, 2023

3.3K
Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing
07:48

Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing

Published on: April 4, 2025

790

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 4, 2025

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills
09:27

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills

Published on: January 19, 2024

1.5K
Author Spotlight: An Accurate and Quantitative Approach to Study Visual Feature Selectivity of the Optokinetic Reflex in Mice
09:28

Author Spotlight: An Accurate and Quantitative Approach to Study Visual Feature Selectivity of the Optokinetic Reflex in Mice

Published on: June 23, 2023

3.3K
Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing
07:48

Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing

Published on: April 4, 2025

790

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Political Science
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • Direct democracy allows citizens to vote on policies, but ballot measures are often complex.
  • Voter comprehension of ballot language is crucial for informed decision-making.
  • Understanding how language complexity affects voting is essential for democratic processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if individual eye movements can predict aggregate voting decisions on ballot measures.
  • To determine if eye-movement patterns reveal comprehension difficulties impacting voting outcomes.
  • To assess the predictive power of eye movements beyond traditional language difficulty metrics.

Main Methods:

  • Two preregistered studies involving 240 registered voters.
  • Monitoring participants' eye movements while they read real U.S. ballot measures.
  • Analyzing eye-movement data for patterns related to language comprehension and comparing with aggregate voting data.

Main Results:

  • Eye-movement responses indicating comprehension difficulties predicted aggregate voting decisions.
  • These predictions included abstention from voting and voting against ballot measures.
  • Eye movements provided predictive power for voting decisions beyond established language difficulty measures.

Conclusions:

  • Eye movements offer a novel method for linking individual-level cognitive processes to large-scale voting behavior.
  • This research demonstrates a new approach to understanding the impact of ballot language on democratic participation.
  • Findings suggest eye-tracking can be a valuable tool for assessing the clarity and impact of public policy communication.