Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 4, 2025

A Bioluminescent and Fluorescent Orthotopic Syngeneic Murine Model of Androgen-dependent and Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
Published on: March 6, 2018
Real-World Practice Patterns and Predictors of Continuous versus Intermittent Androgen Deprivation Therapy Use for
D C Cheung1, S M H Alibhai2, L J Martin3
1Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Intermittent androgen deprivation therapy (IADT) is underutilized in older prostate cancer patients despite evidence of non-inferiority to continuous ADT. Treatment selection involves patient, physician, and sociodemographic factors.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Urology
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Phase-III trials indicate intermittent androgen deprivation therapy (IADT) is not significantly inferior to continuous androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer (PC).
- Clinical practice guidelines show variability in recommendations for IADT versus continuous ADT.
- Real-world utilization patterns of IADT in eligible patient populations require evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the real-world utilization and practice patterns of intermittent androgen deprivation therapy (IADT) in older men with prostate cancer (PC).
- To identify patient and physician predictors influencing the selection of IADT over continuous ADT.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study of Ontario men aged 65 years or older diagnosed with PC and initiating ADT (1997-2017).
- IADT classification based on defined treatment gaps (≥6 months initial, ≥3 months subsequent).
- Multivariable logistic regression analysis to determine predictors of IADT use, adjusting for disease stage and local therapy history.
Main Results:
- 16.4% of eligible patients received IADT, with utilization varying by health region and increasing in those with prior local therapy (26.6%).
- Predictors for IADT use included prior local therapy (OR 1.85) and higher income quintile (OR 1.32).
- Radiation oncologists (OR 1.99) and more experienced physicians (≥10 years, OR 1.44) were more likely to prescribe IADT; higher case volume was significant for radiation oncologists.
Conclusions:
- Intermittent androgen deprivation therapy (IADT) is underutilized in men aged 65+ with prostate cancer, with only 1 in 6 to 1 in 4 eligible patients receiving it.
- Treatment decisions for IADT are influenced by a combination of clinical factors (prior local therapy), sociodemographic characteristics (income), and physician-specific factors (specialty, experience, volume).
Related Concept Videos
Menopause
Dosage Regimens: Designs and Approaches
Disorders of the Male Reproductive System
Prostate disorders are another major concern. These conditions can impair urinary flow due to the prostate's location around the urethra....
Drug Accumulation During Multiple Dosing: Intermittent IV Infusions
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Pharmacodynamics in Geriatric Patients: Effects of Age

