Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 4, 2025

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

Methods to assess research misconduct in health-related research: A scoping review

Esmee M Bordewijk¹, Wentao Li², Rik van Eekelen³

¹Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

|May 25, 2021

Abstract

Objective:

To give an overview of the available methods to investigate research misconduct in health-related research.

Study Design And Setting:

In this scoping review, we conducted a literature search in MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Studies Online (CRSO), and The Virtual Health Library portal up to July 2020. We included papers that mentioned and/or described methods for screening or assessing research misconduct in health-related research. We categorized identified methods into the following four groups according to their scopes: overall concern, textual concern, image concern, and data concern.

Results:

We included 57 papers reporting on 27 methods: two on overall concern, four on textual concern, three on image concern, and 18 on data concern. Apart from the methods to locate textual plagiarism and image manipulation, all other methods, be it theoretical or empirical, are based on examples, are not standardized, and lack formal validation.

Conclusion:

Existing methods cover a wide range of issues regarding research misconduct. Although measures to counteract textual plagiarism are well implemented, tools to investigate other forms of research misconduct are rudimentary and labour-intensive. To cope with the rising challenge of research misconduct, further development of automatic tools and routine validation of these methods is needed.

Trial Registration Number:

Center for Open Science (OSF) (https://osf.io/mq89w).

Keywords:

Data integrity Methods Randomization Research misconduct Scientific misconduct Scoping review

More Related Videos

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Related Concept Videos

Ethics in Research

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.

Bias

Bias

Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:

The Scientific Method in Nursing Process

The Scientific Method in Nursing Process

The scientific method provides the foundation for any research. It is the most reliable and objective of all forms of gaining knowledge and guides in applying research-based evidence in practice and conducting future research.
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be...

Archival Research

Archival Research

Some researchers gain access to large amounts of data without interacting with a single research participant. Instead, they use existing records to answer various research questions. This type of research approach is known as archival research. Archival research relies on looking at past records or data sets to look for interesting patterns or relationships. For example, a researcher might access the academic records of all individuals who enrolled in college within the past ten years and...

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Association of COVID-19 mitigation measures with preterm birth and cervical length: A cohort study.

Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)·2026

Methods to assess trustworthiness of data from peer-reviewed, published randomised controlled trials.

Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E·2026

Do they work, and are they worth it? Proposing a framework of evidence synthesis for guiding the evidence-based use of add-ons in in vitro fertilisation.

Human fertility (Cambridge, England)·2026

Does intracytoplasmic sperm injection outperform conventional in vitro fertilization in couples without severe male factor infertility? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2026

Re-evaluating endometrial injury for IVF: was a promising approach abandoned prematurely? A critical review.

Reproductive biomedicine online·2026

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) pretreatment duration and letrozole supplementation for optimizing live birth rates in women with adenomyosis undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer (GOLD-FET): study protocol for a multicenter, 2 × 2 factorial randomized controlled trial in China.

Trials·2026

See all related articles