Protein analysis and stability: Overcoming trial-and-error by grouping according to physicochemical properties

Today proteins are possibly the most important class of substances. Yet new tasks for proteins are still often solved by trial-and-error approaches. However, in some areas these euphemistically called "screening approaches" are not suitable. E.g. stability tests just take too long and therefore require a more strategic, target-orientated concept. This concept is available by grouping proteins according to their physicochemical properties and then pulling out the right drawer for new tasks. These properties include size, then charge and hydrophobicity as well as their patchinesses, and the degree of order. In addition, solubility, the content of (free) enthalpy, aromatic-amino-acid- and α/β-frequency as well as helix capping, and corresponding patchiness, the number of specific motifs and domains as well as the typical concentration range can be helpful to discriminate between different groups of proteins. Analyzing correlations will reduce the necessary amount of parameters and additional ones, which may be still undiscovered at the present time, can be identified looking at protein subgroups with similar physicochemical properties which still behave heterogeneously. Step-by-step the methodology will be improved. Possibly protein stability will be the driver of this process, but all other areas such as production, purification and analytics including sample pre-treatment and the choice of appropriate separation conditions for e.g. chromatography and electrophoresis will profit from a rational strategy.