Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 4, 2025
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Therapeutic Efficacy of Moving Cupping Along Meridians for Acute Exacerbation of COPD
Published on: September 27, 2024
The Characteristics of Airflow Limitation and Future Exacerbations in Different GOLD Groups of COPD Patients
Qing Song1,2,3, Yi-Yang Zhao1,2,3, Yu-Qin Zeng1,2,3
1Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, People's Republic of China.
Background:
The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2017 separated pulmonary function from combined assessment. We aimed to analyze the characteristics of airflow limitation and future exacerbations in different GOLD groups of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients.
Methods:
For this prospective observational study, stable COPD outpatients were enrolled and divided into Groups A, B, C and D based on GOLD 2017, and followed-up for 18 months. Data on demographics, pulmonary function, COPD assessment test (CAT), Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ), modified Medical Research Council (mMRC), exacerbations, mortality and treatments were collected. A post-bronchodilator ratio of forced expiratory volume in one second to forced vital capacity <0.70 confirms the presence of airflow limitation.
Results:
A total of 993 subjects were classified into Groups A (n = 170, 17.1%), B (n = 360, 36.3%), C (n = 122, 12.3%), and D (n = 341, 34.3%). There were significant differences in mMRC, CAT, CCQ, exacerbations and hospitalizations rates among the different groups (P < 0.001). Groups B and D had more severe airflow limitation than Groups A and C (P < 0.05). In the same groups with different severity of airflow limitation, the differences were mainly observed in body mass index, CAT, CCQ and treatment with long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) and LAMA + long-acting β2-agonist + inhaled corticosteroid (P < 0.05). After 18 months of follow-up, the exacerbations and hospitalizations rates were significantly different among different groups (P < 0.05). However, in the same groups with different airflow limitation severity, the mortality rates and number of exacerbations, hospitalizations and frequent exacerbators showed no differences.
Conclusion:
In the GOLD groups, different severity of airflow limitation had no impact on future exacerbations and mortality rate. It implies that pulmonary function is not a good indicator for predicting exacerbation.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
01:20Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-I: Introduction
01:22Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Smoking is a primary risk factor for COPD, with over 80% of patients having a history of it. Patients typically experience progressive dyspnea or labored breathing, frequent coughing, and recurrent pulmonary infections. Many eventually succumb to respiratory failure, characterized by...
01:27Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-IV: Assessement and Diagnostic Studies
Medical History
01:20COPD: Pathogenesis and Clinical Features
The primary cause for the onset of COPD is cigarette smoking and exposure to air pollution. These hazardous factors initiate a chain reaction within the lungs, resulting in chronic inflammation, damage to the airways, and a...
01:26COPD: Management Using Bronchodilators and Corticosteroids
01:20Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-II: Pathophysiology
Chronic Inflammation