Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 4, 2025

Semiconductor Sequencing for Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy
Published on: August 25, 2019
Chromosomal microarray analysis for pregnancies with abnormal maternal serum screening who undergo invasive prenatal
Xiaoqing Wu1, Ying Li1, Na Lin1
1Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory for Prenatal Diagnosis and Birth Defect, Prenatal Diagnosis Center of Fujian Provincial Maternity and Children Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou City, China.
Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) offers significant value in prenatal diagnosis for pregnancies with abnormal maternal serum screening (AMSS) results, even without ultrasound anomalies. This genetic testing method should be considered for high-risk pregnancies undergoing invasive prenatal testing.
Area of Science:
- Prenatal Diagnosis
- Genetics
- Obstetrics
Background:
- Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) is increasingly used for pregnancies with ultrasound anomalies.
- Its utility in pregnancies solely based on abnormal maternal serum screening (AMSS) requires further evaluation.
- Traditional karyotyping is the standard for prenatal diagnosis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic value of CMA compared to karyotyping in pregnancies with AMSS.
- To assess the incremental yield of CMA in pregnancies with AMSS, with or without ultrasound anomalies.
- To determine the frequency of variants of unknown significance (VUS) with CMA in these pregnancies.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 3973 pregnancies referred for invasive prenatal testing due to AMSS (April 2016-May 2020).
- Comparison of CMA results with traditional karyotyping.
- Categorization of fetuses into AMSS only (Group A) and AMSS with ultrasound anomalies (Group B).
- CMA was performed on 713 prenatal samples.
Main Results:
- The incremental yield of clinically significant findings in pregnancies with high-risk AMSS results was comparable to those with ultrasound soft markers but lower than those with structural anomalies.
- No significant difference in the total frequencies of variants of unknown significance (VUS) was observed between Group A and Group B.
- The uptake of CMA testing increased over the study period in both groups.
Conclusions:
- CMA is a valuable tool for prenatal diagnosis in pregnancies with AMSS, particularly with high-risk results.
- CMA should be considered for pregnant women undergoing invasive prenatal testing due to AMSS, irrespective of concurrent ultrasound findings.
- CMA provides comparable diagnostic yield to karyotyping in specific high-risk prenatal screening scenarios.
More Related Videos
12:32Chromosome Screening of Human Preimplantation Embryos by Using Spent Culture Medium: Sample Collection and Chromosomal Ploidy Analysis
Published on: September 7, 2021
09:30Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy on a Semiconductor Based Next-Generation Sequencing Platform
Published on: August 17, 2022