Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 4, 2025

07:43
In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy
Published on: July 2, 2021
3.2K
Kinematic comparison between asymmetrical and symmetrical polyethylene inserts during deep knee bend activity
Shinichiro Nakamura1, Shinichi Kuriyama1, Hiromu Ito2
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyoto University, Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
Summary
Asymmetrical polyethylene inserts in total knee arthroplasty show a slight kinematic benefit, offering greater axial rotation and posterior femoral rollback compared to symmetrical inserts. Further research is needed to confirm clinical benefits for patients.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic surgery
- Biomedical engineering
- Knee biomechanics
Background:
- The in vivo kinematic advantage of asymmetrical polyethylene inserts over symmetrical ones in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains unclear.
- This study aimed to compare the in vivo kinematics of asymmetrical and symmetrical inserts using the same femoral component design.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze kinematic differences between asymmetrical and symmetrical polyethylene inserts in TKA.
- To determine if asymmetrical inserts provide a kinematic benefit, specifically increased axial rotation and posterior femoral rollback.
Main Methods:
- A randomized study comparing TKA with asymmetrical (17 knees) and symmetrical (16 knees) inserts.
- In vivo knee kinematics were assessed using an image matching technique.
- Asymmetrical inserts featured a postero-lateral flat surface, unlike the symmetrical design.
Main Results:
- The asymmetrical insert group demonstrated significantly greater posterior femoral positioning at 70° and 80° of flexion.
- External femoral rotation was significantly higher at 80° of flexion in the asymmetrical group.
- While greater, the increase in femoral rollback and axial rotation with asymmetrical inserts was not statistically significant.
Conclusions:
- Asymmetrical polyethylene inserts may offer a slight kinematic advantage in TKA, characterized by enhanced axial rotation and posterior rollback.
- Further investigation is warranted to ascertain if these kinematic improvements translate to better patient outcomes, satisfaction, and function.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Knee Joint
2.7K
The knee joint is the most complicated joint in the body. It consists of three articulations– two tibiofemoral and one patellofemoral. As is characteristic of synovial joints, the knee joint has a thin articular capsule that partially surrounds this joint cavity. Additionally, several ligaments, muscles, and cartilaginous structures support the movement of the knee.
A total of seven ligaments support the knee joint. The patellar ligament, which is also attached to the quadriceps femoris...
A total of seven ligaments support the knee joint. The patellar ligament, which is also attached to the quadriceps femoris...
2.7K
Bones of the Lower Limb: Femur and Patella
4.2K
The femur is the body's longest and strongest bone spanning the thigh region. Its head articulates with the acetabulum of the hip bone to form the hip joint. A minor indentation on the medial side of the femoral head, called the fovea capitis, serves as the site of attachment for the ligament of the head of the femur. This weak ligament spans the femur and acetabulum and supports the hip joint. The narrowed region below the head is the neck of the femur. The inclination angle between the...
4.2K

