Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Kinematic Equations for Rotation01:30

Kinematic Equations for Rotation

513
In mechanics, when one observes a rigid body in rotational motion with constant angular acceleration, it is possible to establish equations for its rotational kinematics. This process resembles how linear kinematics are dealt with in simpler motion studies.
For instance, imagine a point A on a rigid body engaged in circular motion. The translational velocity of this particular point can be calculated by taking the time derivatives of the displacement equation, which essentially measures the...
513
Kinematic Equations: Problem Solving01:15

Kinematic Equations: Problem Solving

22.8K
When analyzing one-dimensional motion with constant acceleration, the problem-solving strategy involves identifying the known quantities and choosing the appropriate kinematic equations to solve for the unknowns. Either one or two kinematic equations are needed to solve for the unknowns, depending on the known and unknown quantities. Generally, the number of equations required is the same as the number of unknown quantities in the given example. Two-body pursuit problems always require two...
22.8K
Kinematic Equations - III01:18

Kinematic Equations - III

9.6K
The first two kinematic equations have time as a variable, but the third kinematic equation is independent of time. This equation expresses final velocity as a function of the acceleration and distance over which it acts. The fourth kinematic equation does not have an acceleration term and provides the final position of the object at time t in terms of the initial and final velocities. This equation is useful when the value of the constant acceleration is unknown.
Using the kinematic equations,...
9.6K
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes01:25

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes

626
Consider a component AB undergoing a linear motion. Along with a linear motion, point B also rotates around point A. To comprehend this complex movement, position vectors for both points A and B are established using a stationary reference frame.
However, to express the relative position of point B relative to point A, an additional frame of reference, denoted as x'y', is necessary. This additional frame not only translates but also rotates relative to the fixed frame, making it...
626
Kinematic Equations - II01:17

Kinematic Equations - II

11.9K
The second kinematic equation expresses the final position of an object in terms of its initial position, the distance traveled with the initial constant velocity, and the distance traveled due to a change in velocity. Similar to the first kinematic equation, this equation is also only valid when the acceleration is constant throughout the motion of an object.
Suppose a car merges into freeway traffic on a 200 m long ramp. If its initial velocity is 10 m/s and it accelerates at 2 m/s2, then the...
11.9K
Structural Classification of Joints01:20

Structural Classification of Joints

5.8K
Joints, also known as articulations, are classified based on their structural characteristics, i.e., based on whether the articulating surfaces of the adjacent bones are directly connected by fibrous connective tissue or cartilage, or whether the articulating surfaces contact each other within a fluid-filled joint cavity. These differences serve to divide the joints of the body into three structural classifications.
A fibrous joint is where the adjacent bones are united by fibrous connective...
5.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The energetic cost of human standing balance and gait initiation over a range of natural postures.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same author

Patterns of Muscle Health in Single- and Multi-Site Chronic Pain: A UK Biobank Normative Modeling Study.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

A Tightly Coupled Multibody Dynamics and Multi-Sensor Fusion Algorithm for Simultaneous Kinematics and Kinetics Estimation.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Machine learning approaches in automated infant General Movements Assessment: A scoping review.

Developmental medicine and child neurology·2026
Same author

The menstrual cycle through the lens of a wearable device: insights into physiology, sleep, and cycle variability.

NPJ digital medicine·2026
Same author

BMI and Varus Malalignment Compound to Define a High-Risk Phenotype for Compartment-Specific Knee Osteoarthritis Progression.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 4, 2025

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy
07:43

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy

Published on: July 2, 2021

3.2K

A marker registration method to improve joint angles computed by constrained inverse kinematics.

James J Dunne1,2, Thomas K Uchida3, Thor F Besier4

  • 1Departments of Mechanical Engineering and Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.

Plos One
|May 28, 2021
PubMed
Summary

A new marker registration method improves accuracy in biomechanical analysis. This orientation registration technique reduces errors in joint angles and moments, enhancing the reliability of inverse kinematics computations.

More Related Videos

Four-Dimensional CT Analysis Using Sequential 3D-3D Registration
05:05

Four-Dimensional CT Analysis Using Sequential 3D-3D Registration

Published on: November 23, 2019

8.2K
An Inertial Measurement Unit Based Method to Estimate Hip and Knee Joint Kinematics in Team Sport Athletes on the Field
06:52

An Inertial Measurement Unit Based Method to Estimate Hip and Knee Joint Kinematics in Team Sport Athletes on the Field

Published on: May 26, 2020

8.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 4, 2025

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy
07:43

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy

Published on: July 2, 2021

3.2K
Four-Dimensional CT Analysis Using Sequential 3D-3D Registration
05:05

Four-Dimensional CT Analysis Using Sequential 3D-3D Registration

Published on: November 23, 2019

8.2K
An Inertial Measurement Unit Based Method to Estimate Hip and Knee Joint Kinematics in Team Sport Athletes on the Field
06:52

An Inertial Measurement Unit Based Method to Estimate Hip and Knee Joint Kinematics in Team Sport Athletes on the Field

Published on: May 26, 2020

8.2K

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Motion Analysis
  • Humanoid Robotics

Background:

  • Accurate inverse kinematics requires precise marker registration in motion capture.
  • Current graphical user interface (GUI) methods are subjective and introduce errors.
  • Marker registration error is a significant source of uncertainty in joint angle and moment calculations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify marker registration error in biomechanical analysis.
  • To propose and evaluate an objective, orientation-based marker registration method.
  • To improve the accuracy and repeatability of inverse kinematics.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized OpenSim to analyze gait data from a bipedal humanoid robot with known parameters.
  • Developed a novel marker registration method based on anatomical frame orientation.
  • Compared the proposed method against traditional GUI-based user registration.

Main Results:

  • The orientation registration method reduced average root-mean-square error in joint angles by 67%.
  • Joint moments also showed a 67% average reduction in root-mean-square error.
  • The proposed method eliminated inter-user variability in marker registration.

Conclusions:

  • A systematic, orientation-informed marker registration method significantly enhances accuracy and repeatability.
  • Reducing subjective user input in marker registration is crucial for reliable biomechanical analysis.
  • This approach offers a more objective and precise alternative to GUI-based registration.