Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

4.1K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.1K
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect01:26

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

84
The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...
84
Real-World Application of Classical Conditioning01:15

Real-World Application of Classical Conditioning

894
Classical conditioning not only includes the initial pairing of stimuli but also extends to more complex forms, such as higher-order conditioning. Higher-order conditioning involves creating associations beyond the primary conditioned stimulus, resulting in a chain of conditioned responses.
Higher-order, or second-order, conditioning occurs when a neutral stimulus becomes associated with an already established conditioned stimulus through repeated pairings. For instance, if a dog has been...
894

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Conditioned Motivating Operations: Examples and Practical Considerations.

Behavior analysis in practice·2026
Same author

Consistent Visual Analysis of Multielement Data: A Preliminary Evaluation.

Behavior modification·2024
Same author

Increasing passive compliance to wearing a facemask in children with autism spectrum disorder.

Journal of applied behavior analysis·2021
Same author

On the validity of data produced by isolated and synthesized contingencies during the functional analysis of problem behavior.

Journal of applied behavior analysis·2020
Same author

Providing noncontingent, alternative, functional reinforcers during delays following functional communication training.

Journal of applied behavior analysis·2020
Same author

DRA contingencies promote improved tolerance to delayed reinforcement during FCT compared to DRO and fixed-time schedules.

Journal of applied behavior analysis·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 4, 2025

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.1K

Comparing paired-stimulus and multiple-stimulus concurrent-chains preference assessments: Consistency,

Carissa D Basile1, Jeffrey H Tiger1, Madelynn A Lillie2

  • 1Department of Psychology, Marquette University.

Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
|May 28, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Concurrent-chains preference assessments efficiently identify preferred activities. A new paired-array method is faster than the traditional multiple-stimulus approach, yielding similar preference rankings.

Keywords:
concurrent-chains preference assessmentefficiencymultiple-stimulus preference assessmentpaired-stimulus preference assessmentresponse restriction

More Related Videos

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.7K
Assessment of Cocaine-induced Behavioral Sensitization and Conditioned Place Preference in Mice
10:28

Assessment of Cocaine-induced Behavioral Sensitization and Conditioned Place Preference in Mice

Published on: February 18, 2016

17.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 4, 2025

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.1K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.7K
Assessment of Cocaine-induced Behavioral Sensitization and Conditioned Place Preference in Mice
10:28

Assessment of Cocaine-induced Behavioral Sensitization and Conditioned Place Preference in Mice

Published on: February 18, 2016

17.6K

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Psychology
  • Applied Behavior Analysis
  • Preference Assessment Methods

Background:

  • Concurrent-chains preference assessments are utilized to determine individual preferences for various activities and interventions.
  • The standard method involves simultaneous presentation of stimuli in a multiple-stimulus array, with repeated selections informing preference hierarchies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficiency and efficacy of a novel paired-array stimulus presentation method against the traditional multiple-stimulus model for concurrent-chains preference assessments.
  • To evaluate the correspondence between preference rankings derived from both assessment formats.

Main Methods:

  • Participants completed concurrent-chains preference assessments using both a traditional multiple-stimulus array format and a newly developed paired-array format.
  • Stimuli (e.g., pictures, colored cards) represented various activities or interventions.
  • Preference hierarchies were established based on accumulated selection frequency across trials for each method.

Main Results:

  • Preference assessments conducted using the paired-array format were completed significantly faster than those using the multiple-stimulus format.
  • A high degree of correspondence was observed between the preference rankings generated by the paired-array and multiple-stimulus methods.
  • Both methods successfully identified highly preferred activities and established preference hierarchies.

Conclusions:

  • The paired-array format offers a more time-efficient alternative for conducting concurrent-chains preference assessments without compromising the accuracy of preference rankings.
  • This finding has implications for optimizing preference assessment procedures in clinical and educational settings, particularly when time is a constraint.
  • The paired-array method maintains the integrity of preference assessment while enhancing practical application.