Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 4, 2025

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
User involvement in the making: Positions and types of knowledge enacted in the interaction between service users and
Per Koren Solvang1, Unni Sveen2,3, Helene Lundgaard Søberg1,3
1Department of Physiotherapy, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Background:
Numerous studies of user involvement in research have been conducted. However, there is a lack of studies applying observational methods and addressing the concrete practice of involvement.
Objective:
To determine what knowledge types and competences users apply when involved in the research process through user panel meetings.
Design:
User panel meetings in a qualitative project in rehabilitation were sound-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data analysis applied an abductive approach framed by positioning theory.
Setting And Participants:
Six rehabilitation service users and a similar number of researchers met 20 times during a six-year project period. They discussed various issues in the research process such as interview guides, analysis and dissemination of results.
Findings:
The service users combined their respective knowledge and competence into six positions enacted in the panel interactions. They engaged as co-researchers, based their contributions on their respective personal histories, represented an NGO and peers, applied their respective professional and educational backgrounds and, finally, engaged as concerned citizens.
Discussion And Conclusion:
The findings add to the discussion of professionalization of user involvement by introducing a wider array of positions enacted than do the findings of previous studies. Researchers recruiting user panel members, as well as NGOs appointing candidates for user panels, are advised to consider a wide competence profile for possible candidates. A panel is also considered as a resource in confirming and elaborating on a study's findings.
Patient And Public Contribution:
A service user panel contributed to the study.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
The Representativeness Heuristic
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
Ethics in Research
Principle of Virtual Work: Problem Solving
To apply the principle of virtual work,...
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...

