Real-World Effectiveness of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training for Women With Urinary Tract Symptoms and/or Prolapse

To determine the real-world effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle therapy (PFMT) recommendations for patients.

We conducted a cross-sectional study of 70 women who were advised to undergo PFMT after their initial urogynaecology consultation for lower urinary tract symptoms and/or pelvic organ prolapse. About half (51%) of potential participants consented to answer our telephone survey. We calculated the proportion of patients who complied with the recommendation of PFMT, and we subjectively assessed whether these patients found PFMT to be helpful. We also collected demographic data and looked for reasons why patients did not attend PFMT. Chi-square, 2-tailed t, or Fisher exact tests were used to compare differences between patients who attended and those who did not.

During the 6-month period after their initial consultation, only 28 of 70 women (40%) followed the recommendation to attend PFMT. Sixteen of the 28 women who attended PFMT (57%) reported that they found it helpful. Therefore, the "real-world effectiveness" of the entire study sample was 23%, with only 16 of 70 women benefiting from PFMT. Time constraints (27%) and cost (18%) were the top 2 reasons given for not attending.

Despite evidence-based recommendations in favour of PFMT for various pelvic floor disorders, its real-world effectiveness is quite low. A public health commitment to providing access to PFMT would be of significant benefit.