Research Self-Efficacy and Productivity in Communication Sciences and Disorders Faculty

Area of Science:

• Communication Sciences and Disorders (CSD)
• Academic Research
• Higher Education

Background:

• Evidence-based practice in CSD relies on advancing research.
• Limited data exists on research support and productivity among CSD faculty.
• Understanding faculty experiences is crucial for academic career development.

Purpose of the Study:

• To describe research resources and workload for CSD faculty across different institution types.
• To examine differences in research self-efficacy among faculty based on institution type.
• To identify predictors of research productivity, including self-efficacy, institutional factors, and workload.

Main Methods:

• 144 CSD faculty completed an online survey on institutional and departmental resources.
• Research self-efficacy was measured using the Research Self Efficacy Inventory.
• Research productivity was assessed using the Total Research Productivity Index and analyzed by Carnegie Classification and faculty rank.

Main Results:

• CSD faculty reported similar research self-efficacy across institution types.
• Departmental research resources correlated with institutional Carnegie Classifications.
• Faculty at research-intensive institutions demonstrated higher productivity, despite similar teaching/service loads.
• Research productivity was predicted by Carnegie Classification and time spent on advisement/clinic supervision.

Conclusions:

• Study findings enhance understanding of research resources and limitations in CSD programs.
• Results can inform policy decisions for academic careers in CSD.
• Information provided offers context for students considering CSD academic careers.
• Enhancing research productivity in the CSD field is a key outcome.