Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

24.9K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
24.9K
Ethical Standards II01:23

Ethical Standards II

995
Ethical standards are the backbone of nursing practice, guiding nurses as they interact with patients, families, and colleagues. These standards are crucial for providing safe, empathetic care centered on the patient's needs.
Nurses are entrusted with upholding various ethical principles and standards. Nurses forge solid therapeutic relationships using trust, empathy, autonomy, confidentiality, and professional competence.
Confidentiality is crucial, embodying respect for individual privacy...
995
Ethics and Bioethics01:22

Ethics and Bioethics

2.0K
Ethics is a philosophical study of moral actions. Ethics attempts to determine what is valuable for individuals and society. It examines the rational justification of moral judgments and analyzes what is morally just, fair, and right. Bioethics is a sub-discipline of applied ethics that analyzes the philosophical, social, and legal issues in life sciences and medicine. Ethical theories serve as a foundation for decision-making and represent the viewpoints from which people seek direction. They...
2.0K
Ethical Standards I01:25

Ethical Standards I

1.2K
The American Nurses Association (ANA) created and implemented the first nationally accepted Code of Ethics for Nurses with Interpretive Statements. The Code of Ethics is a living document regularly updated by the ANA and establishes an ethical standard that is non-negotiable for nurses in all roles and settings.
The Code of Ethics provisions outline the nurse's duty to the patient, the healthcare team, the profession, and society. The Code's fundamental principles include advocacy,...
1.2K
Milgram's Obedience to Authority02:20

Milgram's Obedience to Authority

6.7K
Obedience to authority is classically demonstrated in a more famous series of social psychology experiments performed by Stanley Milgram. He was a social psychology professor at Yale who was influenced by the trial of Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi war criminal. Eichmann’s defense for the atrocities he committed was that he was “just following orders.”
6.7K
Obedience01:08

Obedience

33.9K
According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation,...
33.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Understanding of Authorship Guidelines and the Frequency of Authorship Misuse: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study in the State of Qatar.

Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE·2025
Same author

Consciousness and Human Brain Organoids: A Conceptual Mapping of Ethical and Philosophical Literature.

AJOB neuroscience·2025
Same author

Shared decision-making in adolescent healthcare: a literature review of ethical considerations.

European journal of pediatrics·2024
Same author

Taking the risk. A systematic review of ethical reasons and moral arguments in the clinical use of polygenic risk scores.

American journal of medical genetics. Part A·2024
Same author

Mismatch in perceptions of the quality of supervision and research data management as an area of concern: Results from a university-wide survey of the research integrity culture at a Belgian university.

Accountability in research·2024
Same author

Bad apples or systematic problem? Is Italy struggling with maintaining high level of research integrity?

Accountability in research·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 4, 2025

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

4.0K

Stakeholders' perspectives on research integrity training practices: a qualitative study.

Daniel Pizzolato1, Kris Dierickx2

  • 1Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. daniel.pizzolato@kuleuven.be.

BMC Medical Ethics
|May 29, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Current research integrity (RI) training needs improvement. This study used focus groups to gather non-expert stakeholder input, revealing key areas for enhancing RI education strategies and implementation.

Keywords:
Preventive measuresQualitative studyRI educationRI training practicesVirtue-related training

More Related Videos

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

12.3K
Setup and Execution Of the Blindfolded Code Training Exercise
05:25

Setup and Execution Of the Blindfolded Code Training Exercise

Published on: March 29, 2019

9.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 4, 2025

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

4.0K
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

12.3K
Setup and Execution Of the Blindfolded Code Training Exercise
05:25

Setup and Execution Of the Blindfolded Code Training Exercise

Published on: March 29, 2019

9.6K

Area of Science:

  • Scientific research ethics
  • Academic integrity
  • Research misconduct prevention

Background:

  • Existing research integrity (RI) training programs may not sufficiently increase awareness in the scientific community.
  • Recommendations for RI education often lack input from non-expert stakeholders.
  • Qualitative studies on RI training practices are scarce, necessitating broader consultation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore non-expert stakeholders' perspectives on effective research integrity (RI) training.
  • To identify gaps and capacities in current RI educational practices.
  • To inform the development of updated and more effective RI training programs.

Main Methods:

  • A qualitative analysis employing focus groups with diverse stakeholders.
  • Inclusion of five key stakeholder groups: publishers/peer reviewers, RI researchers, RI trainers, PhDs/postdocs, and research administrators.
  • Discussions covered training goals, delivery, and evaluation.

Main Results:

  • Eight key themes emerged from discussions, including training goals, timing, customization, format, mentoring, and evaluation.
  • Participant input confirmed expert recommendations on timing, frequency, and audience.
  • Novel suggestions were proposed regarding teaching approaches, researcher responsibilities, and evaluation systems.

Conclusions:

  • This study provides a foundation for structuring more effective RI education.
  • It highlights essential considerations for planning RI training, including objectives, organization, and teaching methods.
  • Incorporating broader stakeholder perspectives is crucial for advancing research integrity training.