Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 4, 2025

Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
Published on: January 15, 2017
Prehospital Evaluation, ED Management, Transfers, and Management of Inpatient STEMI
Alayn Govea1, Jerry Lipinksi2, Mitul P Patel3
1Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, UC San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA; UC San Diego Sulpizio Cardiovascular Center, 9452 Medical Center Drive #7411, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Insights
ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) diagnoses are decreasing, but risks remain high. Guidelines suggest bypassing the emergency department for stable STEMI patients to speed up treatment and improve outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Emergency Medicine
Background:
- ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) diagnoses have declined in the last decade.
- Despite reduced incidence, STEMI continues to be associated with significant morbidity and mortality.
- Current guidelines emphasize prompt diagnosis and reperfusion therapy, prioritizing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of emergency department bypass protocols on door-to-balloon times for STEMI patients.
- To assess the feasibility of streamlined diagnostic and treatment pathways for STEMI.
- To identify key considerations for emergency providers in managing STEMI, including comorbidities and contraindications.
Main Methods:
- Review of proposed algorithms for STEMI management.
- Analysis of factors influencing diagnostic challenges in STEMI patients, particularly those already hospitalized.
- Focus on emergency provider evaluation strategies for STEMI.
Main Results:
- Algorithms suggest bypassing the emergency department for stable STEMI patients to reduce door-to-balloon times.
- Emergency provider evaluation should prioritize life-threatening conditions and contraindications to catheterization.
- In-hospital STEMI patients present unique diagnostic challenges due to symptom expression and treatment complexities.
Conclusions:
- Streamlining STEMI care pathways, potentially through ED bypass, can improve timely reperfusion.
- Focused evaluation by emergency providers is crucial for efficient STEMI management.
- Addressing diagnostic complexities in hospitalized STEMI patients is essential for optimal outcomes.
Abstract:
ST elevation myocardial infarction diagnoses have reduced in number over the past 10 years; however, associated morbidity and mortality remain high. Societal guidelines focus on early diagnosis and timely access to reperfusion, preferably percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), with fibrinolytics reserved for those who cannot receive timely PCI. Proposed algorithms recommend emergency department bypass in stable patients with a clear diagnosis to reduced door-to-balloon time. Emergency providers should limit their evaluation, focusing on life-threatening comorbidities, unstable vitals, or contraindications to a catheterization laboratory. In-hospital patients prove diagnostically challenging because they may be unable to express symptoms, and reperfusion strategies can complicate other diagnoses.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management
Pulmonary Embolism III: Nursing Management
Introduction Cardiac Emergencies
Angina V: Nursing Management

