Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 4, 2025

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
The Effects of Intensive Blood Pressure Control on Cardiovascular Outcomes Based on 10-Year ASCVD Risk Score: An
Alireza Alborzi1,2, Armin Attar1, Mehrab Sayadi1
1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Insights
Intensive blood pressure control significantly reduced cardiovascular events in patients with high Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) risk. However, intensive treatment increased risks of hypotension and acute renal failure in those with ASCVD ≥15%.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Hypertension Management
- Preventive Medicine
Background:
- Controversy exists regarding the inclusion of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk stratification in hypertension treatment decisions.
- The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) evaluated intensive versus standard blood pressure (BP) control.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the impact of intensive BP control on cardiovascular outcomes based on Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) risk scores.
- To determine if CVD risk stratification should guide hypertension treatment intensity.
Main Methods:
- Post hoc analysis of 9361 nondiabetic SPRINT participants without prior stroke.
- Patients categorized into four groups by ASCVD risk score (<7.5%, 7.5-10%, 10-15%, ≥15%).
- Comparison of primary outcomes (MI, ACS, stroke, HF, cardiovascular death) and adverse events between intensive (<120 mmHg) and standard (<140 mmHg) BP targets.
Main Results:
- Intensive BP control significantly reduced primary outcomes in patients with ASCVD 10-15% (HR 0.593) and ≥15% (HR 0.778).
- Beneficial effects for primary prevention observed in patients with ASCVD 7.5-10% (HR 0.187).
- Higher incidence of hypotension and acute renal failure noted with intensive treatment in the ≥15% ASCVD group.
Conclusions:
- Intensive BP control is crucial for reducing major cardiovascular events in patients with ASCVD risk >10%.
- Intensive treatment offers primary prevention benefits for individuals with ASCVD risk ≥7.5% and no prior cardiovascular history.
- Risk stratification using ASCVD scores can inform the intensity of BP management in hypertensive patients.
Abstract:
There is still controversy about whether clinicians should include cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk stratification into the consideration for treatment of hypertension. This was a post hoc analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT). A total of 9361 nondiabetic patients without a history of stroke were randomly assigned to the intensive-treatment group (with an SBP target of <120 mm Hg) and the standard-treatment group (with an SBP target of <140 mm Hg). The patients were categorized into four groups based on the Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) risk score. The groups contained participants with ASCVD < 7.5%, 7.5% ≤ ASCVD <10%, 10% ≤ ASCVD < 15%, and ASCVD ≥ 15%. The incidence of the primary outcome, secondary outcome, and serious adverse events was compared between the two groups. The primary outcome was a composite of nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), acute coronary syndrome (ACS) not resulting in MI, stroke, acute decompensated heart failure (HF), or death from cardiovascular causes. The secondary outcomes consisted of the individual components of the primary outcome and all-cause death. Intensive blood pressure (BP) control significantly reduced the incidence of primary outcome event in patients with 10% ≤ ASCVD < 15% (hazard ratio (HR) 0.593; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.361-0.975; P = 0.039) and ASCVD ≥ 15% (HR 0.778; CI 0.644-0.940; P = 0.009). Intensive BP control was also beneficial for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with an ASCVD risk of 7.5-10% (HR 0.187; 95% CI 0.040-0.862; P = 0.032). However, intensive treatment was associated with higher incidence of hypotension and acute renal failure in participants with ASCVD ≥ 15%. In patients without diabetes mellitus and prior stroke who had a 10-year risk of cardiovascular events above 10% based on the ASCVD risk score, intensive BP control played an important role in the reduction of major cardiovascular events. Additionally, intensive treatment would be beneficial for primary prevention in patients with ASCVD ≥ 7.5% without previous history of any cardiovascular disorders. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov number; the trial is registered with NCT01206062.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Hypertension and Regulation of Blood Pressure
Hypertension IV: Drug Therapy and Lifestyle Modifications
Factors affecting Blood pressure
Physiological Factors:
Hypertension II: Pathophysiology

