Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 3, 2025

Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing
Published on: January 24, 2020
Susceptibility to Undue Influence: The Role of the Medical Expert in Estate Litigation
Nathan Herrmann1,2, Kimberly A Whaley3, Deidre J Herbert4
1Department of Psychiatry, 71545Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Objectives:
Medical experts are increasingly asked to assist the courts with Will challenges based on the determination of testamentary capacity and potential undue influence. Unlike testamentary capacity, the determination of undue influence has been relatively neglected in the medical literature. We aim to improve the understanding of the medical expert role in providing the courts with an opinion on susceptibility to undue influence in estate litigation.
Method:
Medical experts with experience in the assessment of testamentary capacity and susceptibility to undue influence collaborated with experienced estate litigators. The medical literature on undue influence was reviewed and integrated. The lawyers provided a historical background and a legal perspective on undue influence in estate litigation and the medical experts provided a clinical perspective on the determination of susceptibility to undue influence. Together, they provided recommendations for how the medical expert could best assist the court.
Results:
Susceptibility to undue influence is frequently used in estate litigation to challenge the validity of Wills and is defined as subversion of the testator's free will by an influencer, resulting in changes to the distribution of the estate. While a determination of undue influence includes the documentation of indicia or suspicious circumstances under which the Will was drafted and executed, medical experts should focus primarily on the susceptibility of the testator to undue influence. This susceptibility should be based on a consideration of cognitive function, psychiatric symptoms, physical and behavioural function, with evidence derived from the medical documentation, the medical examination, and the history.
Conclusions:
The determination of undue influence is a legal one, but medical experts can help the court achieve the most informed legal decision by providing relevant information on clinical issues that may impact the testator's susceptibility to undue influence.
Related Concept Videos
Ethics and Bioethics
Ethical Dilemmas II
Eyewitness Memory
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function...
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Dose Adjustments Due to Hepatic Impairment
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

