Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2026

Assessing Species-specific Contributions To Craniofacial Development Using Quail-duck Chimeras
Published on: May 31, 2014
Divergent selection for growth in Japanese quail under split and complete nutritional environments. 1. Genetic and
1Department of Poultry Science, University of Georgia, Athens 30602.
Abstract:
Japanese quail were divergently selected for 4-wk body weight under two different nutritional environments. In one environment quail were divergently selected for high and low body weight (H and L) under a split diet (SD) with quail having the opportunity to self-select feed from high protein and high energy diets. In the other environment, quail were similarly selected (H and L) under a normal (28% protein) complete diet (CD). After 11 generations of selection, H-SD and H-CD lines were 48.9 and 49.7% higher in 4-wk body weight than controls. Quail from L-SD and L-CD lines were 46.5 and 45.4% lower in 4-wk body weight than controls. Realized heritabilities for 4-wk body weight were .36 +/- .03, .30 +/- .03, .52 +/- .02, and .47 +/- .03 for H-SD, L-SD, H-CD, and L-CD lines, respectively. Selection differentials were significantly higher in the SD than in the CD environment. Changes in 2-wk, adult body, and egg weight across generations paralleled that of the trait under selection (4-wk body weight). Selection also resulted in decreased hatchability and egg production with increased age to sexual maturity in both environments. The SD environment was determined to be a stress environment because of birds' inferior growth there compared with growth in the CD environment. Rate of growth, however, to reach adult body size was superior for L-SD quail once the stress environment was removed. There was also evidence that eggs were larger for quail in the SD than the CD environment.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Types of Selection
Frequency-dependent Selection
Limits to Natural Selection
Genetics of Speciation
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
Genetic Variation
Genes exist in different versions called alleles, which...

