Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 3, 2025

10:19
Three-Dimensionally Printed Microfluidic Cross-flow System for Ultrafiltration/Nanofiltration Membrane Performance Testing
Published on: February 13, 2016
11.5K
Effect of membrane hydrophilization on ultrafiltration performance for biomolecules separation
H Susanto1, A Roihatin1, N Aryanti1
1Department of Chemical Engineering, Universitas Diponegoro, Jl. Prof. Sudarto-Tembalang, Semarang, Indonesia.
Summary
This study compares hydrophilization methods for low-fouling ultrafiltration membranes. Reactive phase separation offers superior stability for hydrophilic modifiers compared to conventional methods.
Area of Science:
- Materials Science
- Chemical Engineering
- Membrane Technology
Background:
- Ultrafiltration (UF) membranes are susceptible to fouling, reducing performance.
- Hydrophilization is crucial for developing low-fouling UF membranes.
- Various modification strategies exist, each with potential drawbacks.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness and stability of different hydrophilization techniques for UF membranes.
- To evaluate post-modification, polymer blending, and reactive phase separation methods.
- To assess the impact of hydrophilization on membrane characteristics and performance.
Main Methods:
- Photograft copolymerization of poly(ethylene glycol) methacrylate (PEGMA) for post-modification.
- Non-solvent induced phase separation (NIPS) with hydrophilic additives for polymer blending.
- Reactive phase separation involving UV irradiation before coagulation.
- Characterization using contact angle, FTIR, and SEM.
- Performance evaluation through fouling tests with proteins, polysaccharides, and humic acid.
Main Results:
- All methods enhanced membrane hydrophilicity and reduced fouling.
- Post-modification and polymer blending decreased contact angle but also reduced hydraulic permeability.
- Conventional phase separation methods showed leaching of modifiers.
- Reactive phase separation demonstrated improved stability of the modifier agent within the membrane matrix.
Conclusions:
- Hydrophilization is effective in reducing UF membrane fouling.
- Reactive phase separation presents a more stable approach for incorporating hydrophilic agents compared to conventional methods.
- Trade-offs between hydrophilicity, permeability, and long-term stability must be considered in membrane design.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Detergent Purification of Membrane Proteins
5.8K
Detergents are used to purify the integral proteins of the membrane. The hydrophobic portion of the detergent can replace membrane phospholipids while solubilizing the membrane proteins. When detergent monomers reach a specific concentration in a solution called critical micelle concentration (CMC), they form micelles. Above CMC, the concentration of the detergent monomers remains in equilibrium with the micelle. The number of detergent monomers present in the CMC varies for each detergent, and...
5.8K
Dialysis
1.0K
Dialysis is a diffusion-based purification process that separates analyte molecules from a complex matrix. This is accomplished by allowing molecules in the solution to pass through a semipermeable membrane into a liquid on the other side. The membrane is usually made of cellulose acetate or cellulose nitrate, and the second liquid must be miscible with the solution. Ions (e.g., chloride or sodium) or organic molecules (e.g., glucose) can pass through the membrane pores, which generally have...
1.0K
Membrane Fluidity
164.8K
Cell membranes are composed of phospholipids, proteins, and carbohydrates loosely attached to one another through chemical interactions. Molecules are generally able to move about in the plane of the membrane, giving the membrane its flexible nature called fluidity. Two other features of the membrane contribute to membrane fluidity: the chemical structure of the phospholipids and the presence of cholesterol in the membrane.
164.8K

