Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 3, 2025

Ex Vivo Porcine Experimental Model for Studying and Teaching Lung Mechanics
Published on: April 19, 2024
Machine Learning Models to Predict 30-Day Mortality in Mechanically Ventilated Patients
Jong Ho Kim1,2, Young Suk Kwon1,2, Moon Seong Baek3
1Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Chuncheon 24253, Korea.
Abstract:
Previous scoring models, such as the Acute Physiologic Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score, do not adequately predict the mortality of patients receiving mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit. Therefore, this study aimed to apply machine learning algorithms to improve the prediction accuracy for 30-day mortality of mechanically ventilated patients. The data of 16,940 mechanically ventilated patients were divided into the training-validation (83%, n = 13,988) and test (17%, n = 2952) sets. Machine learning algorithms including balanced random forest, light gradient boosting machine, extreme gradient boost, multilayer perceptron, and logistic regression were used. We compared the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of machine learning algorithms with those of the APACHE II and ProVent score results. The extreme gradient boost model showed the highest AUC (0.79 (0.77-0.80)) for the 30-day mortality prediction, followed by the balanced random forest model (0.78 (0.76-0.80)). The AUCs of these machine learning models as achieved by APACHE II and ProVent scores were higher than 0.67 (0.65-0.69), and 0.69 (0.67-0.71)), respectively. The most important variables in developing each machine learning model were APACHE II score, Charlson comorbidity index, and norepinephrine. The machine learning models have a higher AUC than conventional scoring systems, and can thus better predict the 30-day mortality of mechanically ventilated patients.
Insights
Machine learning models significantly improve 30-day mortality prediction for mechanically ventilated patients, outperforming traditional scoring systems like APACHE II. This advancement offers better patient outcome forecasting in intensive care units.
Area of Science:
- Critical Care Medicine
- Health Informatics
- Machine Learning
Background:
- Conventional scoring models, such as the Acute Physiologic Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), exhibit limitations in accurately predicting mortality for mechanically ventilated patients.
- Accurate mortality prediction is crucial for optimizing intensive care unit (ICU) management and patient care strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To enhance the prediction accuracy of 30-day mortality in mechanically ventilated patients by applying machine learning algorithms.
- To compare the performance of various machine learning models against established scoring systems like APACHE II and ProVent.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a dataset of 16,940 mechanically ventilated patients, split into training-validation (83%) and test (17%) sets.
- Applied and evaluated several machine learning algorithms: balanced random forest, light gradient boosting machine, extreme gradient boost, multilayer perceptron, and logistic regression.
- Compared the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of machine learning models against APACHE II and ProVent scores.
Main Results:
- The extreme gradient boost model achieved the highest AUC (0.79) for 30-day mortality prediction, followed closely by the balanced random forest model (0.78).
- Machine learning models demonstrated superior predictive performance compared to APACHE II (AUC 0.67) and ProVent (AUC 0.69) scores.
- Key variables identified for model development included APACHE II score, Charlson comorbidity index, and norepinephrine administration.
Conclusions:
- Machine learning models offer superior accuracy in predicting 30-day mortality for mechanically ventilated patients compared to conventional scoring systems.
- These advanced models can aid clinicians in better risk stratification and management of critically ill patients requiring mechanical ventilation.
Related Concept Videos
Mechanical Ventilation I: Indication and Settings
Mechanical Ventilation II: Invasive Ventilation
Negative-Pressure Ventilators
Negative-pressure ventilators create a vacuum around the chest or body to draw air into the lungs, simulating breathing. This method does not require an...
Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation...
Ventilatory Modes
There are three ventilatory modes: full support, partial support, and spontaneous. These are described below.
Full Support Modes
Full support modes include controlled mechanical ventilation, continuous mandatory...

