Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 3, 2025

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
Published on: February 6, 2019
Optimizing External Beam Radiotherapy as per the Risk Group of Localized Prostate Cancer: A Nationwide
Seo Hee Choi1,2, Young Seok Kim3, Jesang Yu3
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin 16995, Korea.
External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for localized prostate cancer shows improved survival with dose escalation in high-risk patients using intensity-modulated RT (IMRT). Low-risk patients did not benefit from dose escalation, indicating a need for tailored radiotherapy schemes.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Radiation Oncology
- Prostate Cancer Research
Background:
- External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is a standard treatment for localized prostate cancer.
- Optimizing radiotherapy (RT) schemes based on risk stratification is crucial for improving patient outcomes.
- Current risk classification tools require evaluation for their predictive power in guiding RT decisions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze patterns of care and outcomes for localized prostate cancer patients treated with EBRT.
- To compare the efficacy of various risk classification tools in predicting treatment failure.
- To assess the potential need for refining current RT strategies.
Main Methods:
- A nationwide, multi-institutional study of 1573 non-metastatic prostate cancer patients treated with primary EBRT (2001-2015).
- Patients were re-grouped using risk stratification tools to identify the best predictor of biochemical failure-free survival (BCFFS).
- Evaluated BCFFS, overall survival (OS), and toxicity rates.
Main Results:
- Five- and 10-year BCFFS rates were 82% and 60%, with 5- and 10-year OS rates of 95% and 83%, respectively.
- NCCN risk classification demonstrated the highest predictive power for BCFFS (AUC = 0.556).
- Dose escalation (≥179 Gy1.5) with intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) significantly improved BCFFS and OS in high-risk patients without increased toxicity.
Conclusions:
- NCCN risk classification can guide dose escalation with modern techniques in high-risk prostate cancer patients, potentially improving survival.
- Dose escalation did not benefit low-risk prostate cancer patients.
- Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings and refine RT strategies.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

