Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 3, 2025

Improved Renal Denervation Mitigated Hypertension Induced by Angiotensin II Infusion
Published on: May 26, 2022
Cost effectiveness of antihypertensive drugs and treatment guidelines
Marta Kučan1, Igor Lulić2, Jasenka Mršić Pelčić3
1Primorje-Gorski Kotar County Community Health Centre, Rijeka, Croatia. marta.kucan@ri.t-com.hr.
Insights
Diuretics, calcium channel blockers, and ACE inhibitors are cost-effective treatments for arterial hypertension, offering significant savings and improved quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Diuretics are the most cost-effective first-line option, while beta-blockers are not recommended initially due to higher costs.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacoeconomics
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Health Economics
Background:
- Arterial hypertension (AH) imposes a substantial economic burden on individuals and society.
- Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of different antihypertensive drug classes is crucial for optimizing treatment strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the cost-effectiveness of four main classes of antihypertensives: diuretics (D), beta-blockers (B), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin-II receptor blockers (A), and calcium channel blockers (C).
- To evaluate these treatments against a no intervention (NI) scenario.
Main Methods:
- A Markov model was utilized, incorporating five health states.
- Cost data, including drug acquisition, hospital, and general practice treatments, were sourced from the Croatian Health Insurance Fund.
- Analysis was performed separately for 65-year-old men and women, considering baseline cardiovascular death and heart failure risks.
Main Results:
- For men, diuretics yielded 0.76 QALYs and €886 savings; calcium channel blockers, 0.74 QALYs and €767 savings; ACE inhibitors/ARBs, 0.69 QALYs and €834 savings; beta-blockers, 0.40 QALYs and €41 additional cost.
- For women, diuretics yielded 0.93 QALYs and €987 savings; calcium channel blockers, 0.89 QALYs and €855 savings; ACE inhibitors/ARBs, 0.86 QALYs and €991 savings; beta-blockers, 0.48 QALYs and €148 additional cost.
Conclusions:
- Treatment with diuretics, calcium channel blockers, and ACE inhibitors/ARBs is cost-effective compared to no intervention for arterial hypertension.
- Diuretics emerge as the most cost-effective first-line treatment option.
- Beta-blockers, while increasing QALYs, incur additional costs and are not recommended as a primary first-line therapy based on this analysis.
Purpose:
Arterial hypertension (AH) is associated with a high economic burden for the individual patient and for society in general. The study evaluates antihypertensives and their cost-effectiveness, comparing diuretics (D), beta-blockers (B), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin-II receptor blockers (A) and calcium channel blockers (C) with no intervention (NI).
Methods:
The study included five health states in a Markov model. Cost values included average cost of the drugs used, treatment in hospital and treatment in general practice (collected from Croatian Health Insurance Fund). The study was conducted separately for 65-year old men and women, with an initial probability of cardiovascular death risk of 2% and heart failure risk of 1%. The results were presented in terms of increase in QALYs and associated financial savings or costs in euros (€).
Results:
Results for men (compared with NI): treatment with D resulted in a QALY increase of 0.76 and €886 in savings, treatment with C in an increase of 0.74 QALYs and €767 in savings, treatment with A in an increase of 0.69 QALYs and €834 in savings, treatment with B resulted in an increase of 0.40 QALYs, but with an additional cost of €41. Results for women (compared with NI): treatment with D resulted in an increase of 0.93 QALYs and €987 in savings, treatment with C in an increase of 0.89 QALYs and savings of €855, treatment with A in an increase of 0.86 QALYs and savings of €991, treatment with B in an increase of 0.48 QALYs, but with an additional cost of €148.
Conclusions:
Treatment of AH with D, C and A is cost effective compared with the no-intervention scenario. Diuretics are the most cost-effective first-line treatment. The scenario with beta-blockers resulted in additional QALY when compared with no intervention, but also additional costs; therefore, based on our results, this therapy would not be recommended as first-line treatment.
Related Concept Videos
Hypertension IV: Drug Therapy and Lifestyle Modifications
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Dose-Response Relationship: Potency and Efficacy
Antihypertensive Drugs: Direct Renin Inhibitors
Antihypertensive Drugs: Action of Diuretics

