Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 3, 2025

A Novel Digital Platform for a Monitored Home-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program
Published on: April 19, 2019
Treated Hypertensive Patients Assessed by Home Blood Pressure Telemonitoring. TeleMRPA Study
Weimar Kunz Sebba Barroso1, Audes Diógenes Magalhães Feitosa2, Eduardo Costa Duarte Barbosa3
1Universidade Federal de Goiás - Liga de Hipertensão Arterial, Goiânia, GO - Brasil.
Insights
Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) is crucial for accurately assessing treated hypertensive patients. It reveals a high prevalence of uncontrolled white-coat hypertension and masked hypertension, which casual BP measurements may miss.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Hypertension Management
- Clinical Diagnostics
Background:
- Casual blood pressure (BP) measurements alone may lead to misinformed treatment decisions for hypertensive patients.
- Accurate BP assessment is vital for effective hypertension management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate BP variations between office (casual) and home (HBPM) measurements.
- To analyze the behavior of different antihypertensive drug classes.
- To determine the prevalence of uncontrolled white-coat hypertension (UCWCH) and uncontrolled masked hypertension (UCMH).
Main Methods:
- Cross-sectional study of 6731 treated hypertensive patients using the TeleMRPA platform (2017-2019).
- Exclusion criteria included no antihypertensives, use of 3+ drugs, or specific drug combinations.
- Analysis involved casual BP, HBPM, drug classes, demographics, and statistical tests.
Main Results:
- Mean casual BP was significantly higher than HBPM (SBP: 6.6 mmHg, DBP: 4.4 mmHg).
- BP control rates were higher with HBPM (61.3%) versus casual (57.0%).
- Prevalence of UCWCH was 15.4% and UCMH was 11.1%.
Conclusions:
- Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) is recommended for monitoring treated hypertensive patients due to high UCWCH and UCMH rates.
- Antihypertensive drug efficacy varies when assessed by HBPM.
- HBPM provides a more comprehensive understanding of BP control compared to casual measurements.
Background:
Hypertensive patients undergoing treatment and assessed only by casual blood pressure (BP) measurement may be subject to mistaken decisions.
Objective:
To assess BP behavior by measuring its levels at the office (casual) and at home (HBPM), the behavior of different classes of antihypertensive drugs, and the prevalence of uncontrolled white-coat hypertension (UCWCH) and uncontrolled masked hypertension (UCMH).
Methods:
Cross-sectional study assessing patients who underwent BP monitoring in the TeleMRPA platform between 2017 and 2019. The exclusion criteria were: use of no antihypertensive drug; combined use of 3 or more antihypertensive drugs; and use of spironolactone and alpha-2 agonist. The variables analyzed were: age, sex, body mass index (BMI), number of valid BP measurements, means of systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP, respectively) obtained from HBPM and casual measurement, and the classes of antihypertensive drugs. Paired and unpaired t tests, as well as chi-square test, were used. The 5% significance level was adopted.
Results:
This study selected 22 446 patients, 6731 of whom met the inclusion criteria [61.3%, female sex; mean age, 57.8 (±12.6) years; mean BMI, 29.0 (±5.1) kg/m2]. Mean SBP and DBP were 6.6 mm Hg (p<0.001) and 4.4 mm Hg (p<0.001) higher in casual measurement than in HBPM. The rates of BP control were 57.0% in casual measurement and 61.3% in HBPM (p<0.001), and the prevalence of UCWCH and UCMH was 15.4% and 11.1%, respectively. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade was observed in 74.6% of the patients, and 54.8% were on single-drug therapy.
Conclusions:
HBPM should be considered for the follow-up of treated hypertensive patients because of the high prevalence of UCWCH and UCMH. Antihypertensive drugs behaved differently in HBPM. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2021; [online].ahead print, PP.0-0).
Related Concept Videos
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Hypertension V: Nursing Management
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(one-step method)
Prepare for the Procedure:

