Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 3, 2025

Percutaneous Contrast Echocardiography-guided Intramyocardial Injection and Cell Delivery in a Large Preclinical Model
Published on: January 21, 2018
What can heart failure trialists learn from oncology trialists?
Faiez Zannad1, Gad Cotter2, Angeles Alonso Garcia3
1Université de Lorraine, Inserm Clinical Investigation Center 1439 at Institut Lorrain du Coeur et des Vaisseaux, CHU 54500, University Hospital of Nancy, Nancy, France.
Cardiovascular disease mortality remains high, with few new heart failure drugs approved. This review explores adapting oncology trial designs to improve cardiovascular clinical trials and speed up treatment delivery.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Clinical Trials
- Oncology Research
Background:
- Cardiovascular diseases (CV) and cancers are leading global causes of death, yet cardiovascular disease mortality rates have stagnated over two decades.
- Heart failure (HF) has a high 5-year mortality rate (45-55%), with limited new drug approvals (only four in the USA over 20 years).
- Cancer drug development significantly outpaces cardiovascular drug development, evidenced by higher regulatory approval rates and revenue.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the applicability of oncology clinical trial methodologies to cardiovascular research, particularly for heart failure.
- To identify strategies for streamlining cardiovascular clinical trials, reducing costs, and accelerating the delivery of novel treatments.
- To foster discussion among stakeholders, including trialists, industry, regulators, and patients, on improving cardiovascular trial efficiency.
Main Methods:
- A review of existing cardiovascular and oncology clinical trial designs and outcomes.
- Analysis of drug approval trends and revenue generation in both therapeutic areas.
- Incorporation of insights from discussions at the Cardiovascular Clinical Trialists Workshop.
Main Results:
- Cancer research utilizes smaller trials, shorter follow-up periods, and more targeted therapies compared to cardiovascular research.
- A significant disparity exists in regulatory approvals and investment between cancer drugs and cardiovascular drugs, especially for heart failure.
- The current cardiovascular clinical trial paradigm may require re-evaluation to enhance efficiency and patient benefit.
Conclusions:
- Elements of oncology research design, such as smaller, shorter trials and targeted therapies, could be adapted to improve cardiovascular clinical trials.
- Implementing oncology-inspired approaches may accelerate the development and approval of new treatments for cardiovascular diseases, particularly heart failure.
- Collaboration among clinical trialists, industry, regulatory bodies, and patients is crucial for optimizing cardiovascular trial processes.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Heart Failure VII: Nursing Interventions
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers

