Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 3, 2025

A Novel Digital Platform for a Monitored Home-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program
Published on: April 19, 2019
Effect of the Million Hearts Cardiovascular Disease Risk Reduction Model on Initiating and Intensifying Medications:
G Greg Peterson1, Jia Pu2, David J Magid3
1Mathematica, Washington, DC.
Insights
The Million Hearts Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) Risk Reduction Model modestly increased medication use for high-risk Medicare patients. This pay-for-performance initiative showed a small but significant improvement in cardiovascular risk management.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Disease Research
- Health Services Research
- Health Economics
Background:
- The Million Hearts Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) Risk Reduction Model incentivizes provider organizations to reduce cardiovascular risk in Medicare patients.
- Previous strategies have focused on medication adherence and risk factor management, but the impact of pay-for-performance models requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of the Million Hearts CVD Risk Reduction Model in increasing the initiation or intensification of antihypertensive and statin medications.
- To assess the model's impact on blood pressure and LDL cholesterol levels in high-risk Medicare beneficiaries.
Main Methods:
- A cluster-randomized, pragmatic trial involving Medicare patients enrolled in the Million Hearts model.
- Analysis of Medicare Part D claims for medication initiation/intensification and clinical data for blood pressure and LDL cholesterol levels.
- Intent-to-treat analysis comparing intervention and control groups over a 1-year period post-enrollment.
Main Results:
- The model led to a statistically significant increase in the initiation or intensification of statins or antihypertensive medications for both high-risk (4.8 percentage points) and medium-risk (3.1 percentage points) patients.
- Among high-risk patients with available clinical data, the intervention group showed slightly lower LDL cholesterol (-1.8 mg/dL) and systolic blood pressure (-1.7 mm Hg) compared to the control group.
- Despite high baseline medication use, the pay-for-performance model demonstrated a modest but significant impact on medication management for cardiovascular risk reduction.
Conclusions:
- The Million Hearts CVD Risk Reduction Model resulted in modest but significant improvements in cardiovascular medication use and risk factor control.
- Pay-for-performance initiatives can be effective in promoting guideline-adherent care for cardiovascular disease prevention in Medicare populations.
- Further research is needed to assess the long-term impact on clinical outcomes such as myocardial infarction and stroke.
Importance:
The Million Hearts Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) Risk Reduction Model pays provider organizations for measuring and reducing Medicare patients' cardiovascular risk.
Objective:
To assess whether the model increases the initiation or intensification of antihypertensive medications or statins among patients with blood pressure or low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels above guideline thresholds for treatment intensification.
Design, Setting, And Participants:
This prespecified secondary analysis of a cluster-randomized, pragmatic trial included primary care and cardiology practices, health care centers, and hospital-based outpatient departments across the US. Participants included Medicare patients who were enrolled into the model in 2017 by participating organizations and who were at high risk and at medium risk of a myocardial infarction or stroke in 10 years. Patient outcomes were analyzed for 1 year postenrollment (through December 2018) using an intent-to-treat design. Analysis began November 2019.
Interventions:
US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services paid organizations for risk stratifying Medicare patients and reducing CVD risk among high-risk patients through discussing risk scores, developing individualized risk reduction plans, and following up with patients twice yearly.
Main Outcomes And Measures:
Initiating or intensifying statin or antihypertensive therapy within 1 year of enrollment, measured in Medicare Part D claims, and LDL cholesterol and systolic blood pressure levels approximately 1 year after enrollment, measured in usual care and reported to Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services via a data registry (data complete for 51% of high-risk enrollees). The study's primary outcome (incidence of first-time myocardial infarction and stroke) is not reported because the trial is ongoing.
Results:
A total of 330 primary care and cardiology practices, health care centers, and hospital-based outpatient departments and 125 436 Medicare patients were included in this analysis. High-risk patients in the intervention group had a mean (SD) age of 74 (4.1), 15 213 (63%) were male, 21 657 (90%) were receiving antihypertensive medication at baseline, and 16 558 (69%) were receiving statins. Almost all (21 791 [91%]) high-risk intervention group patients had above-threshold systolic blood pressure level (>130 mm Hg), LDL cholesterol level (>70 mg/dL), or both. Patients in the intervention group with these risk factors were more likely than control patients (8127 [37.3%] vs 4753 [32.4%]; adjusted difference in percentage points, 4.8; 95% CI, 2.9-6.7; P < .001) to initiate or intensify statins or antihypertensive medication. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services did not pay for CVD risk reduction for medium-risk enrollees, but initiation or intensification rates for these enrollees were also higher in the intervention vs control groups (12 668 [27.9%] vs 7544 [24.8%]; adjusted difference in percentage points, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.9-4.3; P < .001). Among high-risk enrollees with clinical data approximately 1 year after enrollment, LDL cholesterol level was slightly lower in the intervention vs control groups (mean [SD], 89 [31.8] vs 91 [32.1] mg/dL; adjusted difference in percentage points, -1.8; 95% CI, -2.9 to -0.6; P = .002), as was systolic blood pressure (mean [SD], 133 [15.7] vs 135 [16.4] mm Hg; adjusted difference in percentage points, -1.7; 95% CI, -2.8 to -0.6; P = .003).
Conclusions And Relevance:
In this study, a pay-for-performance model led to modest increases in the use of CVD medications in a range of organizations, despite high medication use at baseline.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Rheumatic Heart Disease III: Medical Management

