Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

DNA Isolation01:24

DNA Isolation

42.9K
DNA isolation protocols can be fast and straightforward or complex and time-consuming depending on the type and quality of DNA required for further processing. For example, plasmid DNA extraction is a bit more complicated than genomic DNA extraction because of the need for an appropriate lysis method to separate plasmid DNA from gDNA during isolation. However, for specific applications, such as long-range DNA sequencing that require a good yield of high- quality DNA samples, we need to follow...
42.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Rewilding reshapes gut microbiomes and parasite exposure in European bison: a 17‑month release from Wilder Blean.

Journal for nature conservation·2026
Same author

High Quality, Granular, Timely, Trustworthy and Efficient Vertebrate Species Distribution Data Across a 30,000 km<sup>2</sup> Protected Area Complex.

Ecology letters·2025
Same author

Funding Distributions, Trends, Gaps, and Policy Implications for Spinal Cord Injury Research: A Systematic Analysis of U.S. Federal Funds.

Journal of neurotrauma·2025
Same author

More than presence-absence; modelling (e)DNA concentration across time and space from qPCR survey data.

Journal of statistical theory and practice·2025
Same author

Lymphatic dysfunction correlates with inflammation in a mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Disease models & mechanisms·2025
Same author

Funding distributions, trends, gaps, and policy implications for spinal cord injury research: A systematic analysis of US federal funds.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2025
Same journal

Turbulent flow in a vortex separator with a directed pipe inlet.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Systematic characteristic evaluation of clay-based cementitious material derived from calcium carbide residue and waste tile powder.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Retraction Note: Improvement of a rapid diagnostic application of monoclonal antibodies against avian influenza H7 subtype virus using Europium nanoparticles.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Applying large language models to spam detection in the Kazakh low-resource language setting.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

An open-source 3D printing system enabling in-situ freeze-thaw processing of hydrogels.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

An enhanced EfficientNet framework for automated waste classification using cosine annealing and label smoothing.

Scientific reports·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 3, 2025

Development and Testing of Species-specific Quantitative PCR Assays for Environmental DNA Applications
08:54

Development and Testing of Species-specific Quantitative PCR Assays for Environmental DNA Applications

Published on: November 5, 2020

15.4K

Optimising sampling and analysis protocols in environmental DNA studies.

Andrew Buxton1, Eleni Matechou2, Jim Griffin3

  • 1Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, School of Anthropology and Conservation, University of Kent, Marlowe Building, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7NR, UK. A.S.Buxton@kent.ac.uk.

Scientific Reports
|June 3, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Accounting for false positives in environmental DNA (eDNA) surveys is crucial. Replication in both sample collection and lab analysis improves occupancy estimates, reducing bias and uncertainty in species detection.

More Related Videos

Use of a Filter Cartridge for Filtration of Water Samples and Extraction of Environmental DNA
08:04

Use of a Filter Cartridge for Filtration of Water Samples and Extraction of Environmental DNA

Published on: November 25, 2016

27.6K
Visualizing Methane-Cycling Microbial Dynamics in Coastal Wetlands
07:26

Visualizing Methane-Cycling Microbial Dynamics in Coastal Wetlands

Published on: January 31, 2025

617

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 3, 2025

Development and Testing of Species-specific Quantitative PCR Assays for Environmental DNA Applications
08:54

Development and Testing of Species-specific Quantitative PCR Assays for Environmental DNA Applications

Published on: November 5, 2020

15.4K
Use of a Filter Cartridge for Filtration of Water Samples and Extraction of Environmental DNA
08:04

Use of a Filter Cartridge for Filtration of Water Samples and Extraction of Environmental DNA

Published on: November 25, 2016

27.6K
Visualizing Methane-Cycling Microbial Dynamics in Coastal Wetlands
07:26

Visualizing Methane-Cycling Microbial Dynamics in Coastal Wetlands

Published on: January 31, 2025

617

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Conservation Biology
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Ecological surveys face challenges with false positive and false negative species detections.
  • Environmental DNA (eDNA) methods introduce potential errors at sample collection and laboratory analysis stages.
  • Accurate species occupancy estimation is vital for effective conservation and ecological management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of false positive errors on occupancy models using qPCR-based eDNA data.
  • To compare occupancy estimates from models with and without false positive error correction.
  • To determine optimal replication strategies for eDNA sampling to improve parameter estimates.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of a large qPCR-based eDNA dataset using two occupancy models: one accounting for false positives (Griffin et al., 2020) and one assuming no false positives (Stratton et al., 2020).
  • Application of the Griffin et al. (2020) model to simulated data to assess the effect of replication at different sampling stages.
  • Comparison of occupancy and detectability estimates between the two models and with prior species occupancy data.

Main Results:

  • The model assuming no false positives (Stratton et al., 2020) consistently overestimated species occupancy compared to the Griffin et al. (2020) model and previous estimates.
  • Incorporating replication at both sample collection and laboratory analysis stages significantly reduced bias and narrowed credible intervals for occupancy and detectability.
  • Collecting multiple samples from a site offered greater improvement in parameter estimates than relying solely on numerous laboratory replicates.

Conclusions:

  • Statistical models accounting for false positive errors are essential for accurate eDNA-based species occupancy estimation.
  • Replication strategies in eDNA surveys, particularly at the sample collection stage, are critical for robust ecological inference.
  • Optimized replication protocols can enhance the reliability and precision of eDNA survey results for conservation applications.